The difference in the fibrosis progression of recurrent hepatitis C after live donor liver transplantation versus deceased donor liver transplantation is attributable to the difference in donor age

✍ Scribed by Nazia Selzner; Nigel Girgrah; Les Lilly; Maha Guindi; Markus Selzner; George Therapondos; Oyedele Adeyi; Ian McGilvray; Mark Cattral; Paul D. Greig; David Grant; Gary Levy; Eberhard L. Renner

• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
• Year: 2008
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 227 KB
• Volume: 14
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 1527-6465
• DOI: 10.1002/lt.21598

✦ Synopsis

Hepatitis C recurs universally after liver transplantation (LT). Whether its progression differs after live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) is still debated. We retrospectively analyzed 201 consecutive LTs performed at our institution for hepatitis C-related end-stage liver disease between April 2000 and December 2005 (46 LDLTs and 155 DDLTs). Patients were followed with protocol biopsies for medians of 29 (LDLT) and 39 months (DDLT; P ϭ 0.7). Although overall graft and patient survival did not differ, the mean fibrosis stage (Metavir) was significantly higher at 12 to 48 months post-LT (all P Ͻ 0.05), and the rate of fibrosis progression tended to be faster after DDLT than LDLT (0.19 versus 0.11 stage/year, P ϭ 0.05). In univariate analysis, donor age, cold ischemic time, and DDLT were significantly associated with a fibrosis stage Ն 1 at 1 year and a fibrosis stage of 3 or 4 at 2 years post-LT. In multivariate analysis, however, donor age was the sole variable independently associated with both surrogate outcomes. Thus, donor age Ͼ 45 years carried a relative risk of 8.17 (confidence interval ϭ 2.6-25.5, P ϭ 0.001) for reaching fibrosis stage 3 or 4 at 2 years post-LT. In conclusion, donor age, rather than the transplant approach, determines the progression of recurrent hepatitis C after LT. LDLT, allowing for the selection of younger donors, may particularly benefit hepatitis C patients.