✦ LIBER ✦

Letter: Reply to Salander et al.

✍ Scribed by Michael A. Weitzner; Christina A. Meyers

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1998
Tongue: English
Weight: 34 KB
Volume: 7
Category: Article
ISSN: 1057-9249
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1611(199803/04)7:2<143::aid-pon335>3.0.co;2-8

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Reply to letter by winrow et al

✍ John S. Sullivan; Andrew F. Geczy; John K. Prendergast 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 242 KB

Reply to letter by winrow et al

✍ A. Toubert; B. Amor 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 130 KB 👁 1 views

Reply to the letter by MacLeod et al.

✍ Hisashi Kubota; Takafumi Nishizaki; Kohsuke Sasaki 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 28 KB

We are grateful to Dr. MacLeod and his colleagues for raising this important suggestion. As they commented, in several cases it is not possible to rule out accidental inclusion of syngeneic subclones in the analysis due to cell line cross-contamination. Therefore, such cell line cross-contamination

Author's reply to letter by Andersen et

Author's reply to letter by Andersen et al.

✍ Cook, Stephen D. 📂 Article 📅 1985 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 88 KB

Letter to the editor: Reply to Nysom et

Letter to the editor: Reply to Nysom et al.

✍ Ilhan, Inci; Sarialioglu, Faik; Bilgiç, Hayati 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 22 KB 👁 2 views

We have read the article by Nysom et al. [1] entitled, ''Risk Factors for Reduced Pulmonary Function After Malignant Lymphoma in Childhood.'' It would seem that somehow Dr. Nysom et al. have misinterpreted the results reported by us [2] in that they claim that we ''found normal or better than normal

Reply to the letter of Botto et al. [199

Reply to the letter of Botto et al. [1998]

✍ Froster, Ursula G.; Jackson, Laird 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 1 KB 👁 2 views

We would like to thank Dr. Botto et al. for their response to my Letter to the Editor [Froster, 1996]. I did not intend to imply that Botto et al. [1996] misclassified limb deficiencies. My intention was simply to point out that there are differences in the classification of limb defects. It is co