District Judge Lee Rosenthal granted final approval to the settlement of discrimination claims against Quietflex Manufacturing Company. Under the terms of the settlement, the company's insurer will pay $2.8 million to 78 current and former Latino employees. In addition, the company has agreed to imp
Legal developments—roundup of employment-related news
✍ Scribed by Elizabeth D. MacGillivray; H. Juanita M. Beecher; Deirdre Golden
- Publisher
- Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 216 KB
- Volume
- 26
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1932-2054
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Wal-Mart Not Required To Provide Interpreter When Firing Deaf Employee
Wal-Mart's failure to provide an interpreter for a deaf employee during his termination meeting was not a violation of the ADA, according to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, which found that the employee's ability to communicate effectively at the meeting was neither an "essential function" of his job nor one of the "privileges and benefits" of employment requiring a reasonable accommodation under the ADA. Donald Novella, who is deaf, worked for the company as an unloader of merchandise from October 2002 until November 2003. Novella told management that he saw vulgar and offensive messages on the men's room walls about his fiancée, another Wal-Mart employee. When Novella repeatedly complained, store managers said they had a videotape of him writing on the bathroom walls but allegedly refused to allow him to see the tape. During his termination meeting, Novella asked for an interpreter so he could understand the reason for his firing. The company refused to supply one and had two local police officers escort him from the store. He has not been allowed to return to the store since, which Novella says has forced him and his fiancée to drive 30 miles to buy food, clothing, and groceries. The appellate court in upholding summary judgment for the company said that it was based on EEOC regulations that say an "accommodation" is reasonable only if it enables the employee to perform the essential functions of the job. Communications at a termination meeting is not an "essential function" of an employee's job, according to court. The court avoided determining whether the ability to understand charges and defend oneself at a termination meeting qualifies as one of the "benefits and privileges" of employment.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Women Denied Jobs Because of Hijab, Says EEOC The EEOC has sued the Marriott Louisville Downtown, alleging it denied housekeeping jobs to four Muslim women because they wore hijab. The women found other housekeeping jobs where they were allowed to wear the hijab. The lawsuit seeks an injunction
## Judge Rules that Gay R.I. Couple Can Marry in Massachusetts Gay rights groups are hailing the decision by a Massachusetts Superior Court judge who ruled that a gay couple from Rhode Island has the right to marry in Massachusetts. The couple, Wendy Becker and Mary Norton of Providence, R.I., arg
## Truth Behind Women's "Opting Out" A study by Heather Boushey, an economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research, "Are Women Opting Out? Debunking the Myth," finds that although there was a drop in women's work participation rates between 2001 and 2005, it was largely because of a weak
## More Research on the Relationship between Marriage and Earnings Recent studies have demonstrated that there is a marriage penalty for women and the opposite effect for men. A new research paper from the Urban Institute examines the relationship between earnings and marriage and specifically the