✦ LIBER ✦

Learning online? Educational Internet use and participation in adult learning, 2002 to 2010

✍ Scribed by White, Patrick; Selwyn, Neil

Book ID: 126765933
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Group
Year: 2012
Tongue: English
Weight: 152 KB
Volume: 64
Category: Article
ISSN: 0013-1911
DOI: 10.1080/00131911.2011.626123

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Modelling the ‘learning divide’: predict

Modelling the ‘learning divide’: predicting participation in adult learning and future learning intentions 2002 to 2010

✍ White, Patrick 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Taylor and Francis Group 🌐 English ⚖ 115 KB

Using Internet technology to support fle

Using Internet technology to support flexible learning in business education

✍ John A. Campbell 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 125 KB

Second Language Use, Socialization, and

Second Language Use, Socialization, and Learning in Internet Interest Communities and Online Gaming

✍ STEVEN L. THORNE; REBECCA W. BLACK; JULIE M. SYKES 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 184 KB

Improving Access to and Participation in

Improving Access to and Participation in Adult Learning in OECD Countries

✍ Beatriz Pont 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 101 KB

Interaction in distance education and on

Interaction in distance education and online learning: using evidence and theory to improve practice

✍ Philip C. Abrami; Robert M. Bernard; Eva M. Bures; Eugene Borokhovski; Rana M. T 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 318 KB

Using Technology to Enhance Adult Learni

Using Technology to Enhance Adult Learning in the Counselor Education Classroom

✍ Edina L. Renfro-Michel; Kim C. O'Halloran; Megan E. Delaney 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 American Counseling Association 🌐 English ⚖ 127 KB

The authors present a study that used a conceptual framework of adult learning and differentiated learning styles with graduate students in a counselor education classroom. Students in a hybrid course had higher midterm, group proposal, and posttest scores than did students in a face-to-face course