๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Laws, causality and the intentional explanation of action

โœ Scribed by Zhu Xu


Publisher
Higher Education Press and Springer
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
217 KB
Volume
5
Category
Article
ISSN
1673-3436

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


On the logic of causal explanation
โœ Vladimir Lifschitz ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 877 KB

The McCain-Turner semantics of causal rules is based on a fixpoint construction similar to the one found in the definition of default logic. In the special case when the heads of the rules are literals, it can be equivalently expressed by a translation from sets of rules into sets of propos:itional

Kant and the General Law of Causality
โœ Wrynn Smith ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1977 ๐Ÿ› Springer Netherlands ๐ŸŒ English โš– 868 KB

Due to a misreading of Kant's reversibility criterion, J.G. Murphy has claimed that the view L. W. Beck ascribes to Kant in the 'Second Analogy' in the Critique of Pure Reason presupposes rather than demonstrates the General Law of Causality (GLC as I shall call it). 1 Indeed, Kant does seek in the

Orthogonal expansions and the causality
โœ Henning F. Harmuth ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1985 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 771 KB

The use of orthogonal expansions leads sometimes to results that clearly do not satisfy the causality law. The best known.example is the filtering of a step function by a lowpass filter with idealized frequency cut-off. The Fourier transform yields in this case an output function starting at the tim