๐”– Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

๐Ÿ“

Inventing equal opportunity

โœ Scribed by Frank Dobbin


Publisher
Princeton University Press
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Leaves
319
Category
Library

โฌ‡  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Equal opportunity in the workplace is thought to be the direct legacy of the civil rights and feminist movements and the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964. Yet, as Frank Dobbin demonstrates, corporate personnel experts--not Congress or the courts--were the ones who determined what equal opportunity meant in practice, designing changes in how employers hire, promote, and fire workers, and ultimately defining what discrimination is, and is not, in the American imagination.

Dobbin shows how Congress and the courts merely endorsed programs devised by corporate personnel. He traces how the first measures were adopted by military contractors worried that the Kennedy administration would cancel their contracts if they didn't take "affirmative action" to end discrimination. These measures built on existing personnel programs, many designed to prevent bias against unionists. Dobbin follows the changes in the law as personnel experts invented one wave after another of equal opportunity programs. He examines how corporate personnel formalized hiring and promotion practices in the 1970s to eradicate bias by managers; how in the 1980s they answered Ronald Reagan's threat to end affirmative action by recasting their efforts as diversity-management programs; and how the growing presence of women in the newly named human resources profession has contributed to a focus on sexual harassment and work/life issues.

Inventing Equal Opportunity reveals how the personnel profession devised--and ultimately transformed--our understanding of discrimination.

โœฆ Table of Contents


Frontmatter
Acknowledgments (page ix)
1. Regulating Discrimination: The Paradox of a Weak State (page 1)
2. Washington Outlaws Discrimination with a Broad Brush (page 22)
3. The End of Jim Crow: The Personnel Arsenal Put to New Purposes (page 41)
4. Washington Means Business: Personnel Experts Fashion a System of Compliance (page 75)
5. Fighting Bias with Bureaucracy (page 101)
6. The Reagan Revolution and the Rise of Diversity Management (page 133)
7. The Feminization of HR and Work-Family Programs (page 161)
8. Sexual Harassment as Employment Discrimination (page 190)
9. How Personnel Defined Equal Opportunity (page 220)
Notes (page 235)
Bibliography (page 261)
Index (page 289)


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Inventing Equal Opportunity
โœ Frank Dobbin ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐ŸŒ English

Equal opportunity in the workplace is thought to be the direct legacy of the civil rights and feminist movements and the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964. Yet, as Frank Dobbin demonstrates, corporate personnel experts--not Congress or the courts--were the ones who determined what equal opportunity

Inventing Equal Opportunity
โœ Frank Dobbin ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› Princeton University Press ๐ŸŒ English

<p>Equal opportunity in the workplace is thought to be the direct legacy of the civil rights and feminist movements and the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964. Yet, as Frank Dobbin demonstrates, corporate personnel experts--not Congress or the courts--were the ones who determined what equal opportuni

Rethinking Equal Opportunity
โœ Harlan Beckley ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2024 ๐Ÿ› Rowman & Littlefield Publishers ๐ŸŒ English

<p><span>This book explores equal opportunityโ€”more accurately โ€œfair equality of opportunityโ€โ€”as a norm that commands at least casual consent from many U.S. citizens. If we could agree what fair equality of opportunity actually requires, this shared conception could offer a collective normative princ

Rethinking Equal Opportunity
โœ Harlan Beckley ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2024 ๐Ÿ› Rowman & Littlefield Publishers ๐ŸŒ English

<p><span>This book explores equal opportunityโ€”more accurately โ€œfair equality of opportunityโ€โ€”as a norm that commands at least casual consent from many U.S. citizens. If we could agree what fair equality of opportunity actually requires, this shared conception could offer a collective normative princ