Institutional review boards (IRBs) are responsible for regulating and safeguarding research with human participants in academic institutions in the United States. The authors explore (a) the historical impetus for IRBs, (b) the ethical values and principles as core components of the review process,
Institutional review boards and educational research
✍ Scribed by Laura Lowe Furge‡
- Publisher
- The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
- Year
- 2011
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 35 KB
- Volume
- 39
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1470-8175
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Do institutional researchers need to get approval from their Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)? Are IRBs difficult to work with? This chapter explains the functioning of IRBs and offers suggestions for enhancing cooperation between IRBs and institutional researchers.
## Abstract Information Science researchers and designers are well‐positioned to become active participants in scholarly and institutional conversations concerning the protection of human subjects. The overall goals of this panel are: 1) to extend the discourse within the Information Science field
## Abstract Higher education scholars and institutional researchers rely heavily on self‐reported survey data in their work. This chapter explores problems associated with self‐reports and provides questions and recommendations for their use.
## Abstract Institutional research has solidified and enhanced its role within institutions of higher education and better articulated itself as a professional community.
## Abstract Increasing security threats, new and old, to the data assets of higher education require mitigation through an institutional security program based on risk assessment and grounded in clear governance.