𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Institutional Review boards: Ethics, regulations and the research agenda

✍ Scribed by Lisa P. Nathan; Alpha S. DeLap; Phillip M. Edwards; Nathan G. Freier

Publisher
Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
47 KB
Volume
46
Category
Article
ISSN
0044-7870

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis

Abstract

Information Science researchers and designers are well‐positioned to become active participants in scholarly and institutional conversations concerning the protection of human subjects. The overall goals of this panel are: 1) to extend the discourse within the Information Science field concerning the protection of human subjects in research; 2) to explore new ways to improve the relationship between researchers and Institutional Review Boards; and 3) to advance current Institutional Review Board policies and procedures concerning the use of iterative, culturally appropriate, qualitative methods within social science research. This panel will stimulate conversations through which β€œIRBs and investigators accept their common charge to meet the needs of subjects and to improve the quality of research.” (Burke, 2005, p. 921)

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Institutional Review Boards and Professi
Institutional Review Boards and Professional Counseling Research
✍ Edward H. Robinson III; Jennifer R. Curry πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› American Counseling Association 🌐 English βš– 140 KB

Institutional review boards (IRBs) are responsible for regulating and safeguarding research with human participants in academic institutions in the United States. The authors explore (a) the historical impetus for IRBs, (b) the ethical values and principles as core components of the review process,

Institutional review boards and institut
Institutional review boards and institutional researchers
✍ John M. Kennedy πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2005 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons βš– 69 KB

## Abstract Do institutional researchers need to get approval from their Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)? Are IRBs difficult to work with? This chapter explains the functioning of IRBs and offers suggestions for enhancing cooperation between IRBs and institutional researchers.

Presenteeism in the workplace: A review
Presenteeism in the workplace: A review and research agenda
✍ Gary Johns πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 180 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract Presenteeism refers to attending work while ill. Although it is a subject of intense interest to scholars in occupational medicine, relatively few organizational scholars are familiar with the concept. This article traces the development of interest in presenteeism, considers its variou

The relationship between affective and n
The relationship between affective and normative commitment: review and research agenda
✍ Mindy E. Bergman πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 131 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract Meyer and Allen's (1991, 1997) three component conceptualization of organizational commitment (OC) includes affective (AC), continuance (CC), and normative (NC) commitment. However, AC and NC have not been as empirically differentiated as theoretically expected. Drawing on the extant li