High-dose cyclophosphamide and 5-fluorouracil versus vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide in advanced carcinoma of the breast: A phase III study of the piedmont oncology association (POA)

✍ Scribed by Patricia J. Zekan; Hyman B. Muss; Robert L. Capizzi; M. Robert Cooper; Robert W. Harding; Judith O. Hopkins; Don V. Jackson; William L. Ramseur; Frederick Richards II; Charles L. Spurr; John J. Stuart; Douglas R. White; Ellen Pope; L. Douglas Case; H. Bradley Wells

• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
• Year: 1984
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 569 KB
• Volume: 54
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 0008-543X
• DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19841201)54:11<2338::aid-cncr2820541105>3.0.co;2-4

✦ Synopsis

Forty-nine patients with advanced carcinoma of the breast who had received no prior chemotherapy were randomized to receive either high-dose cyclophosphamide (C) 1250 mg/M2 intravenously on day 1 and 5-fluorouracil (F) 600 mg/M2 intravenously on days 1 through 5 (CF), or vincristine (V) 1.5 mg/M2, doxorubicin (A) 50 mg/M2 and cyclophosphamide (C) 500 mg/M2 (VAC), all intravenously on day 1. Both regimens were repeated at 3-week intervals. Nine of 25 patients (36%) treated with CF and ten of 21 patients (48%) treated with VAC showed a complete or partial response as defined by the (UICC) guidelines. The estimated median time to progression for all patients was 3.5 months for C F and 6.0 months for VAC, with the median time to progression for responding patients being 8.5 months on C F and 6.3 months on VAC. Estimated survival is also similar for the two regimens. Ten of the patients treated with high-dose CF experienced septic episodes and four died. Toxicity on the CF arm necessitated premature closure of the study, and thus full statistical comparison of the efficacy of the two regimens cannot be made.