๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Heterogeneity of HLA genetic factors in IDDM susceptibility

โœ Scribed by M. Martell; A. Marcadet; A. Moine; C. Boitard; I. Deschamps; J. Dausset; J. F. Bach; D. Cohen


Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Year
1990
Tongue
English
Weight
781 KB
Volume
31
Category
Article
ISSN
0093-7711

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


The association of certain HLA-D alleles with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) is well known. One hundred and sixty-one non-related diabetic individuals and 142 non-related healthy controls were typed for the HLA DR-DQw-Dw association, using a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) typing method that combines three probe/enzyme systems: DRB/Taq I, DQB/Taq I, and DQB/Bam HI. Comparison of frequencies in both diabetics and controls confirms previous results in terms of HLA class II and IDDM association. Moreover, we have found that DR3/3 heterozygous individuals are more susceptible to IDDM when they are also Dw25 (associated with B18) than when they are Dw24 (associated with B8). Using oligonucleotide dot-blot hybridizations we analyzed the HLA-DQB1 sequence of DR3,Dw24 and DR3,Dw25 homozygous individuals, and we found no difference at position 57 between these two DR3-carrying haplotypes. This observation points to the heterogeneity of HLA genetic factors in IDDM susceptibility.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Genetics of IDDM: Evidence for complex i
โœ Dr. Neil Risch ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1989 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 361 KB

Analysis of the Fifth Genetic Analysis Workshop (GAWS) insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) data leads to the following conclusions: 1) With a maximum-likelihood affected sib pair method, there is strong evidence for linkage with HLA and no evidence for linkage with INS, Gm, or Km. 2) Suscepti

On the measurement of susceptibility to
โœ Muin J. Khoury; W. Dana Flanders; D. C. Rao; George P. Vogler ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1989 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 752 KB

Geneticists usually measure the phenotypic effects of a single gene trait in terms of penetrance and recurrence risks in relatives of affected individuals, while epidemiologists usually compute measures of relative and attributable risks. These concepts can be merged to measure the proportion of ind