𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Head and neck oncology research— A summary of the second international head and neck oncology research conference

✍ Scribed by Wolf, Gregory T. ;Al-Sarraf, Muyhi ;Crissman, John D. ;Forastiere, Arlene A. ;Hong, Waun K. ;Richtsmeier, Wm. H. ;Steinberg, Bettie M. ;Wheeler, Richard ;Carey, Thomas E. ;Baker, Shan R. ;Ensley, John F. ;Fu, Karen K. ;Kashima, Haskins ;Schantz, Stimson P. ;Wanebo, Harold J. ;Wustrow, Thomas P. U.

Publisher
Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
Year
1988
Weight
664 KB
Volume
10
Category
Article
ISSN
0148-6403

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis

A series of working group discussions were held during the recent Second International Head and Neck Oncology Research Conference. The purpose of these discussions was to define clinical and basic research priorities in the areas of chemotherapy, tumor immunology, tumor model development, flow cytometry, etiology, and virology. The results of these discussions are summarized and condensed in this report. The recommendations of the various Working Groups indicate that intensive basic 'Arlington, Virginia, September 9-12, 1987.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

State of head and neck surgical oncology
State of head and neck surgical oncology research—A review and critical appraisal of landmark studies
✍ Kevin M. Higgins; Jenny R. Wang 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 103 KB

## Abstract Surgical literature has been criticized for the lack of high‐quality research. The present review examines methodological quality of literature published in head and neck surgical oncology. We focus on landmark studies published on topics of best practice controversy, namely (1) the rol

Surgical margin determination in head an
Surgical margin determination in head and neck oncology: Current clinical practice. The results of an International American Head and Neck Society Member Survey
✍ Jeremy D. Meier; Dana A. Oliver; Mark A. Varvares 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 156 KB 👁 2 views

Background. Our aim was to investigate the ways in which surgeons who perform head and neck ablative procedures on a regular basis define margins, how they use frozen sections to evaluate margins, and the effect of chemoradiation on determining tumor margins. Methods. A custom-designed questionnair

Phase II evaluation of galactitol in hea
Phase II evaluation of galactitol in head and neck cancer: A southwest oncology group study
✍ Haas, Charles D. ;Lehane, Daniel ;Bottomley, Richard 📂 Article 📅 1983 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 208 KB

## Abstract A phase II evaluation of DAG in head and neck cancer patients produced one partial response and one patient with prolonged stable disease from nine fully evaluable patients with squamous carcinomas. One partial response was produced in a patient with anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. No dru

Importance of patient examination to cli
Importance of patient examination to clinical quality assurance in head and neck radiation oncology
✍ David I. Rosenthal; Joshua A. Asper; Jerry L. Barker Jr.; Adam S. Garden; K. S. 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 132 KB 👁 3 views

## Abstract ## Background. When quality assurance programs in clinical radiation oncology focus mainly on the technical aspects of treatment, they tend to underplay questions of therapeutic process and outcome. We determined the value of clinical peer review in radiation therapy for head and neck