## Abstract ## Background The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among patients presenting to a head and neck oncology clinic prior to a diagnosis. ## Methods The study was conducted by administering questionnaires to 102 patient
Importance of patient examination to clinical quality assurance in head and neck radiation oncology
β Scribed by David I. Rosenthal; Joshua A. Asper; Jerry L. Barker Jr.; Adam S. Garden; K. S. Clifford Chao; William H. Morrison; Randal S. Weber; K. Kian Ang
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 132 KB
- Volume
- 28
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1043-3074
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
Background.
When quality assurance programs in clinical radiation oncology focus mainly on the technical aspects of treatment, they tend to underplay questions of therapeutic process and outcome. We determined the value of clinical peer review in radiation therapy for head and neck cancer that involved head and neck examination.
Methods.
Data were collected prospectively on 134 consecutive patients with preliminary radiation therapy (RT) plans. Peer review was performed that included head and neck examination and imaging review to confirm target localization.
Results.
Peer review led to changes in treatment plans for 66% of patients. Most changes were minor, but 11% of changes were major and thought to be of a magnitude that could potentially affect therapeutic outcome or normal tissue toxicity. Most changes involved target delineation based on physical findings
Conclusions.
Peer review of radiation target localization in RT plans led to changes that could potentially affect rates of cancer control or complication in about 10% of patients. We suggest that the accuracy of head and neck radiation oncology treatment plans might be increased by coβexamination by another head and neck cancer specialist, typically a radiation oncologist or head and neck surgeon, to confirm RT target volumes. Β© 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2006
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
The technical and professional issues that affect the clinical util-Ity of intraoperative frozen section diagnosis in head and neck surgery are addressed from a quality assurance perspective. The most common reasons for sampling errors and interpretive errors are discussed. We offer several recommen
Background. This study investigated the individual and collective (''community'') equipoise of surgeons and oncologists and their willingness to take part in each of six hypothetical randomized controlled trials in head and neck oncology. Methods. A survey was mailed to Australasian head and neck s
## Abstract ## Background Multiple oral complaints develop during radiation therapy for head and neck cancer, and quality of life is affected after treatment. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the quality of life, oral function, and oral symptoms in a cohort of patients during and af
## Abstract ## Background. Xerostomia is a common, debilitating complication of radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancer. This article reviews the pathogenesis of radiationβinduced xerostomia, its impact on quality of life (QOL), and treatment options. ## Methods. Virtually all patients u
Background. The quality of life (QL) of cancer patients has attracted an increasing interest in recent years. Patients with head and neck cancer often have troublesome symptoms due to the disease and to treatment side effects, which will have an impact on the patient's QL. The aim of this study was