𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Importance of patient examination to clinical quality assurance in head and neck radiation oncology

✍ Scribed by David I. Rosenthal; Joshua A. Asper; Jerry L. Barker Jr.; Adam S. Garden; K. S. Clifford Chao; William H. Morrison; Randal S. Weber; K. Kian Ang


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2006
Tongue
English
Weight
132 KB
Volume
28
Category
Article
ISSN
1043-3074

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Background.

When quality assurance programs in clinical radiation oncology focus mainly on the technical aspects of treatment, they tend to underplay questions of therapeutic process and outcome. We determined the value of clinical peer review in radiation therapy for head and neck cancer that involved head and neck examination.

Methods.

Data were collected prospectively on 134 consecutive patients with preliminary radiation therapy (RT) plans. Peer review was performed that included head and neck examination and imaging review to confirm target localization.

Results.

Peer review led to changes in treatment plans for 66% of patients. Most changes were minor, but 11% of changes were major and thought to be of a magnitude that could potentially affect therapeutic outcome or normal tissue toxicity. Most changes involved target delineation based on physical findings

Conclusions.

Peer review of radiation target localization in RT plans led to changes that could potentially affect rates of cancer control or complication in about 10% of patients. We suggest that the accuracy of head and neck radiation oncology treatment plans might be increased by co‐examination by another head and neck cancer specialist, typically a radiation oncologist or head and neck surgeon, to confirm RT target volumes. Β© 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2006


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Complementary and alternative medicine u
✍ Tarren Vyas; Robert D. Hart; Jonathan R. Trites; Timothy J. Philips; Kathleen E. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 307 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract ## Background The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among patients presenting to a head and neck oncology clinic prior to a diagnosis. ## Methods The study was conducted by administering questionnaires to 102 patient

Clinical utility of intraoperative froze
✍ Dr. Regina F. Gandour-Edwards; Paul J. Donald; J. T. Lie πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1993 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 320 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

The technical and professional issues that affect the clinical util-Ity of intraoperative frozen section diagnosis in head and neck surgery are addressed from a quality assurance perspective. The most common reasons for sampling errors and interpretive errors are discussed. We offer several recommen

Clinical trials in head and neck oncolog
✍ Jane M. Young; Christopher O'Brien; James D. Harrison; Michael J. Solomon πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 315 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

Background. This study investigated the individual and collective (''community'') equipoise of surgeons and oncologists and their willingness to take part in each of six hypothetical randomized controlled trials in head and neck oncology. Methods. A survey was mailed to Australasian head and neck s

Quality of life and oral function in pat
✍ Joel B. Epstein; Manuella Robertson; Sue Emerton; Norm Phillips; Peter Stevenson πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2001 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 118 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract ## Background Multiple oral complaints develop during radiation therapy for head and neck cancer, and quality of life is affected after treatment. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the quality of life, oral function, and oral symptoms in a cohort of patients during and af

Radiation-induced Xerostomia in patients
✍ Mark S. Chambers; Adam S. Garden; Merrill S. Kies; Jack W. Martin πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2004 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 129 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract ## Background. Xerostomia is a common, debilitating complication of radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancer. This article reviews the pathogenesis of radiation‐induced xerostomia, its impact on quality of life (QOL), and treatment options. ## Methods. Virtually all patients u

Malnutrition and food intake in relation
✍ Eva Hammerlid; Brita Wirblad; Carina Sandin; Claes Mercke; Staffan EdstrΓΆm; Stei πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 111 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Background. The quality of life (QL) of cancer patients has attracted an increasing interest in recent years. Patients with head and neck cancer often have troublesome symptoms due to the disease and to treatment side effects, which will have an impact on the patient's QL. The aim of this study was