Genetic linkage and complex diseases: A comment
โ Scribed by R. C. Elston; A. F. Wilson
- Book ID
- 102225570
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1990
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 191 KB
- Volume
- 7
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0741-0395
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Results from the study by Sherrington et a]. [1988] indicate that the maximum lod score (3.2) from a linkage analysis between narrowly defined clinical diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia and polymorphic markers on chromosome 5 is lower than that (6.5) from an analogous analysis between broadly defined clinical criteria for psychiatric illness and these same markers. Should these results be interpreted to indicate that in the families studied the narrowly defined clinical phenotype for schizophrenia is due to a single locus located on chromosome 5 , with the inclusion of other psychiatric illness spuriously inflating the lod score? Or do they indicate that a locus located on chromosome 5 is responsible, at least in part, for a spectrum of psychiatric illness that can include schizophrenia? We agree with Risch [ 19901 that current evidence indicates that single-locus segregation can account for at most a small fraction of the cases of schizophrenia in general. We further believe that there is no strong evidence that schizophrenia is largely polygenic, in the sense that many loci with additive effects are involved. The analyses performed by McGue et al. [1985], for example, although interpreted by them to indicate polygenic inheritance, really only indicate the presence of epistasis on the penetrance scale, and hence segregation at a minimum of two loci. We therefore believe that segregation and linkage analysis of schizophrenic families is not a lost cause. We further believe, perhaps in contrast to Risch, that because of the nonexperimental nature of human genetic studies, linkage will eventually provide us with the soundeset path for elucidating the genetic etiology of complex diseases.
At the outset, a distinction needs to be made between two different ways in which segregation and linkage analysis can be used to investigate the genetic etiology of complex diseases or traits. In the first approach, the phenotype for a complex trait is assumed to be adequately identified, usually as a distinct clinical entity, and we try to identify the
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
For diseases with a complex mode of inheritance, such as schizophrenia, traditional linkage analysis assuming Mendelian inheritance of a single gene may be expected to have relatively low power, but to occasionally detect (in fortuitous pedigree samples) either a rare gene which by itself causes the
I should like to make four points in connection with Neil Risch's [ 19901 provocative and thoughtful review.
A linkage test in complex disease is well motivated under either of two conditions: if a prior segregation analysis has given evidence for a major gene, or if there is a candidate locus that may influence liability. Although methods have been developed for pairs of affected relatives without specify
Dr. Risch [ 19901 is to be commended for his authoritative investigation and review of the many potential problems associated with linkage analysis of complex diseases. Such a comprehensive report has long been due. Here, I would like to expand on a technique briefly referred to towards the end of t
Thefirst thing to do in the study of human heredity is tofind characters which vary sharply so as to divide mankind definitely into classes. . . . Now i f we had about fifty such characters . . . we could use them . . .for the study of such characters as musical ability, obesity and bad temper. When