To investigate the origin of fragile X mutations in the Argentine population, we studied the alleles and haplotypes at DXS548 and FRAXAC1 loci of 42 unrelated fragile X chromosomes and 168 normal ones. Four haplotypes presented in linkage disequilibrium and accounted for 76.2% of fragile X chromosom
Founder effect in a Belgian-Dutch fragile X population
β Scribed by Sonja Buyle; Edwin Reyniers; Lieve Vits; Kristel Boulle; Ingrid Handig; Floris L. E. Wuyts; Wout Deelen; Dicky J. J. Halley; Ben A. Oostra; Patrick J. Willems
- Book ID
- 104680154
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 1993
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 381 KB
- Volume
- 92
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0340-6717
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
For many years, the high prevalence of the fragile X syndrome was thought to be caused by a high mutation frequency. The recent isolation of the FMR1 gene and identification of the most prevalent mutation enable a more precise study of the fragile X mutation. As the vast majority of fragile X patients show amplification of an unstable trinucleotide repeat, DNA studies can now trace back the origin of the fragile X mutation. To date, de novo mutations leading to amplification of the CGG repeat have not yet been detected. Recently, linkage disequilibrium was found in the Australian and US populations between the fragile X mutation and adjacent polymorphic markers, suggesting a founder effect of the fragile X mutation. We present here a molecular study of Belgian and Dutch fragile X families. No de novo mutations could be found in 54 of these families. Moreover, we found significant (P < 0.0001) linkage disequilibrium in 68 unrelated fragile X patients between the fragile X mutation and an adjacent polymorphic microsatellite at DXS548. This suggests that a founder effect of the fragile X mutation also exists in the Belgian and Dutch populations. Both the absence of new mutations and the presence of linkage disequilibrium suggest that a few ancestral mutations are responsible for most of the patients with fragile X syndrome.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
The apparent associations between fragile X mutations and nearby microsatellites may reflect both founder effects and microsatellite instability. To gain further insight into their relative contributions, we typed a sample of 56 unrelated control and 37 fragile X chromosomes from an eastern Finnish
Microsatellite markers RS46 (DXS548) and FRAXAC2 flanking the fragile X mutation, an expansion of a (CGG)n repeat within the FMR-1 gene, were typed in 60 unrelated northern and eastern Finnish fragile X families and in a control population from the same geographical region. A significant difference