We report on the haplotype analysis with polymorphic repeat markers DXS548 and FRAXAC1 next to the FMR1 gene in 37 unrelated fragile X and 36 control chromosomes from Bohemia and Moravia. Our results suggest a significant linkage disequilibrium between fragile X mutations and certain DXS548-FRAXAC1
The fragile X syndrome in Finland: demonstration of a founder effect by analysis of microsatellite haplotypes
✍ Scribed by Rutva Haataja; Marja-Leena Väisänen; Muyao Li; Markku Ryynänen; Jaakko Leisti
- Book ID
- 104666436
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 1994
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 379 KB
- Volume
- 94
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0340-6717
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Microsatellite markers RS46 (DXS548) and FRAXAC2 flanking the fragile X mutation, an expansion of a (CGG)n repeat within the FMR-1 gene, were typed in 60 unrelated northern and eastern Finnish fragile X families and in a control population from the same geographical region. A significant difference was found in allelic and haplotypic distributions between the normal X and fragile X chromosomes. Evidence for a strong founder effect was detected, with the haplotype 196-153 being present on 80% of the fragile X chromosomes, but on only 8% of the normal X chromosomes. In addition to this major haplotype, four minor haplotypes were found on the fragile X chromosomes. These results suggest that the majority of present-day fragile X mutations in Finland may have a common initial ancestor, probably from the 16th century.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
The fragile X mental retardation syndrome is caused by an expansion of a trinucleotide repeat (CGG)n in the FMR-1 gene. Molecular genetic study of fragile X provides accurate diagnosis and facilitates genetic counseling in families with affected members. We present here the molecular study of 59 Spa
## Abstract Molecular diagnosis of Fragile X Syndrome (FXS) is carried out by PCR or Southern blot analysis on DNA isolated from leukocytes. These DNA analyses are time consuming and expensive, making it impractical for mass screening programs. We have recently standardized and tested the diagnosti
We report on a series of 453 mentally retarded subjects investigated for fragile X syndrome from 1982 to July 1995. The 22% rate of efficiency of FRAX positivity indicated a significant preselection by the c h icians. However, this rate dropped to ll% in the last year. Since 1992, Southern blot anal