FERC's summary rejection powers

FERC's illusive late-intervention policy

✍ Drom, Richard A. 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons ⚖ 379 KB

T probably should be "if late, then never" when discussing certain untimely interventions in Commission proceedings. FERC has frequently been denying late interventions in its proceedings, particularly when settlement discussions may have begun. -. -"better late than never" probably should be "if l

FERC's rush toward negotiated rates

✍ Drom, Richard A. 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons ⚖ 406 KB

0 departed from traditional rate design. It openly embraced a firm transportation (FT) rate design that does not comport with Order 636 and is based on negotiations between a pipeline and its customers.

FERC's road to settlement reform

✍ Grenier, Edward J. 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons ⚖ 441 KB

FERC's rate-of-return approach flawed

✍ Smead, Richard G. 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons ⚖ 240 KB

## FERC's Rate-of-Return Approach Flawed n this column, I recently started addressing 1 the Commission's current methodology for setting pipeline rates of return. I noted that there was strong concern voiced by industry financial analysts. Accordingly, I tried to answer the question as to whether

Has FERC's jurisdiction now been resolve

Has FERC's jurisdiction now been resolved?

✍ Morgan, Richard G. ;Drom, Richard A. 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons ⚖ 379 KB

On September 17, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission issued an order that clarified the commission's authority over production and gathering lines, under Sectionl(b) of the Natural Gas A n Specifically, the commission modified its prior application of theprimaryfirnction test to include conside

FERC's complaint procedure good for indu

FERC's complaint procedure good for industry

✍ Moring, Frederick 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons ⚖ 369 KB

A effort to amend FERC's procedures for considering complaints against pipeline companies was launched in May 1996 by an impressive coalition of pipeline customers. These included three industrial end user groups, four LDC groups, and two producer groups representing both majors and independents. Th