0 departed from traditional rate design. It openly embraced a firm transportation (FT) rate design that does not comport with Order 636 and is based on negotiations between a pipeline and its customers.
FERC's rate-of-return approach flawed
โ Scribed by Smead, Richard G.
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2007
- Weight
- 240 KB
- Volume
- 13
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0743-5665
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
FERC's Rate-of-Return Approach Flawed
n this column, I recently started addressing 1 the Commission's current methodology for setting pipeline rates of return. I noted that there was strong concern voiced by industry financial analysts. Accordingly, I tried to answer the question as to whether there was some disconnect between the long-term analysis done by the Commission and the real expectations of investors. Ultimately, the problem seems to lie in the use of the long-term gas-revenue-growth forecasts published by DRI/McGraw-Hill. The criticism is not of the forecasts themselves, but rather of the use to which they are put by the Commission. The forecasts seriously dilute the assessment of investor requirements that are supposed to be yielded by the discounted cash flow (DCF) model used at the Commission.
How significant is the dilution caused by averaging the DRI-derived growth rate with analysts' projections reported by the Institutional Brokerage Estimate System (IBES)? The dilution is very significant.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
We consider real-valued functions defined on 0, 1 . Both the class of Baire one functions and the class of Baire-one, Darboux functions have been characterized using first return limit notions. The former class consists of the first return recoverable functions and the latter consists of the first r