𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Employment after liver transplantation

✍ Scribed by Paul C. Adams; Cameron N. Ghent; David R. Grant; William J. Wall


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1995
Tongue
English
Weight
577 KB
Volume
21
Category
Article
ISSN
0270-9139

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The objective of this study was to study the factors affecting employment after liver transplantation. The employment status and health status of 203 adult liver transplant recipients was assessed retrospectively in a survey comprising an employment questionnaire, the Sickness Impact Profile (SID), and the Medical Outcomes Survey (MOS). The patient population consisted of all surviving adult patients who had undergone liver transplantation between 1982 and 1992 at our institution and who had survived a minimum of 9 months. Fiftyseven percent of the recipients were employed and 43% of the recipients were unemployed. Eighteen percent of the recipients considered themselves not well enough to work. Other reasons cited for not working in the unemployed patients were early retirement (8%), return to school (3%), family reasons (3%), no work available (3%), and chose not to work (3%). Patient age, duration of disability before transplantation, and type of job before transplantation significantly affected posttransplantation employment status. Health status measurements predicting employment were ambulation, home management, physical functioning, and pain. Older recipients and those who were continuously out of the workforce for several years before transplantation were the least likely to return to gainful employment after liver transplantation. These findings have implications for assessing the success of liver transplantation and the implementation of strategies to fully rehabilitate patients after liver grafting. (HEPATOLOGY 1995; 21:140-144.) During the past decade liver transplantation has become the treatment of choice for end-stage liver disease. Patient survival rates, which were poor before the use of cyclosporine, have become firmly established at approximately 75% at 5 years.' Appropriately, less emphasis is now on survival and more on quality of life and rehabilitation after transplantation. This has arisen partly because of the attention that is being focused on the economic aspects of health care, in particular when expensive modalities such as liver transplantations are Ahhreviations: SIP, Sickncss Impact Profile; MOS, Medical Outcomes Survey.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Protothecosis after liver transplantatio
✍ Masashi Narita; Robert R. Muder; Thomas V. Cacciarelli; Nina Singh πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 103 KB

Prototheca species are unicellular algae of low virulence that are rarely associated with human infections. We report a liver transplant recipient with disseminated protothecosis and review the literature on this unusual opportunistic infection in transplant recipients. Of 9 cases, including ours, 5

Seizures after liver transplantation
✍ Wszolek, Zbigniew K. ;Steg, Robert E. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1995 πŸ› Wiley (John Wiley & Sons) 🌐 English βš– 496 KB
Ascites after liver transplantation
✍ Isabel Cirera; Miguel Navasa; Antoni Rimola; Juan Carlos GarcΓ­a-PagΓ‘n; Luis Gran πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2000 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 84 KB

Massive ascites after liver transplantation, although uncommon, usually represents a serious adverse event. The pathogenesis of this complication has not been adequately investigated. To determine the incidence, characteristics, and pathogenic factors of massive ascites after liver transplantation (

Aplastic anemia after liver transplantat
✍ Robert H. Collins Jr.; Goran B. Klintmalm; Mark S. Cattral; Alan N. Langnas πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1995 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 190 KB