𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Ascites after liver transplantation

✍ Scribed by Isabel Cirera; Miguel Navasa; Antoni Rimola; Juan Carlos García-Pagán; Luis Grande; Juan Carlos Garcia-Valdecasas; Josep Fuster; Jaime Bosch; Juan Rodes


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2000
Tongue
English
Weight
84 KB
Volume
6
Category
Article
ISSN
1527-6465

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Massive ascites after liver transplantation, although uncommon, usually represents a serious adverse event. The pathogenesis of this complication has not been adequately investigated. To determine the incidence, characteristics, and pathogenic factors of massive ascites after liver transplantation (ascitic fluid G 500 mL/d for G10 days), the charts of 378 liver transplant recipients were reviewed. Massive ascites occurred in 25 patients (7%). Mean ascitic fluid production was 960 mL/d (range, 625 to 2,350 mL/d), and the duration of ascites was 77 days (range, 15 to 223 days). The ascitic fluid had a high protein content (36 ؎ 7 g/L; range, 25 to 50 g/L). When patients who did and did not develop massive ascites were compared, significant differences were found in receptor sex (men, 88% v 60%, respectively; P F .01) and surgical technique (inferior vena cava preservation with piggyback technique, 72% v 41%; P F .01). Significantly increased wedged and free hepatic venous pressures and gradients between hepatic vein and right atrial pressures were found in patients who developed ascites, suggesting a difficulty in graft blood outflow. Massive ascites was associated with renal impairment, increased incidence of abdominal infection, prolonged hospitalization, and a tendency toward reduced survival. In conclusion, massive ascites after liver transplantation is relatively uncommon but associated with increased morbidity and mortality and is predominantly related to difficulties of hepatic venous drainage. Measurement of hepatic vein and atrial pressures to detect a significant gradient and correct possible alterations in hepatic vein outflow should be the first approach in the management of these patients.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Ascites after liver transplantation—A my
✍ Charmaine A. Stewart; Jason Wertheim; Kim Olthoff; Emma E. Furth; Colleen Brensi 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 89 KB

Ascites after liver transplantation, although uncommon, presents a serious clinical dilemma. The hemodynamic changes that support the development of ascites before liver transplantation are resolved after transplant; therefore, persistent ascites (PA) after liver transplantation is unexpected and po

Splenic artery embolization for the trea
✍ Cristiano Quintini; Giuseppe D'Amico; Chase Brown; Federico Aucejo; Koji Hashimo 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 283 KB 👁 1 views

Refractory ascites (RA) is a challenging complication after orthotopic liver transplantation. Its treatment consists of the removal of the precipitating factors. When the etiology is unknown, supportive treatment can be attempted. In severe cases, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts, port

Protothecosis after liver transplantatio
✍ Masashi Narita; Robert R. Muder; Thomas V. Cacciarelli; Nina Singh 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 103 KB

Prototheca species are unicellular algae of low virulence that are rarely associated with human infections. We report a liver transplant recipient with disseminated protothecosis and review the literature on this unusual opportunistic infection in transplant recipients. Of 9 cases, including ours, 5

Seizures after liver transplantation
✍ Wszolek, Zbigniew K. ;Steg, Robert E. 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 Wiley (John Wiley & Sons) 🌐 English ⚖ 496 KB