A Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study I n their recent article, Coyne et al. 1 vastly overstated the quality of their study and the meaning of their findings. ## Poor Measurement They used only 4 items from an Emotional Well-Being subscale, which hardly constitutes a reliable assessment of dep
Emotional well-being does not predict survival in head and neck cancer patients : A radiation therapy oncology group study
โ Scribed by James C. Coyne; Thomas F. Pajak; Jonathan Harris; Andre Konski; Benjamin Movsas; Kian Ang; Deborah Watkins Bruner
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 98 KB
- Volume
- 110
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-543X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Abstract
BACKGROUND.
The objective of the current study was to examine whether emotional wellโbeing predicted survival in a large sample of patients with head and neck cancer who were participating in multicenter clinical trials.
METHODS.
Participants were enrolled in 2 Radiation Oncology Group (RTOG) clinical trials (RTOG 9003 and RTOG 9111) and completed a baseline measure of quality of life (the Functional Assessment of Cancer TherapyโGeneral [FACTโG]), which included an Emotional WellโBeing subscale. The outcome measure was overall survival. Main statistical analyses included overall survival rates, which were estimated by using the KaplanโMeier method with univariate comparisons analyzed using the logโrank test. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine whether emotional wellโbeing had prognostic impact on survival after accounting for tumorโrelated and sociodemographic variables. Additional exploratory analyses examined possible subgroup effects.
RESULTS.
No statistically significant univariate or multivariate effects were observed for emotional wellโbeing, and there were no effects limited to subgroups. These results stand in sharp contrast to the prognostic value of a variety of demographic and clinical variables.
CONCLUSIONS.
The current results add to the weight of the evidence that emotional functioning is not an independent predictor of survival in cancer patients. The study had the advantage of a large number of deaths to be explained in a sample with the uniformity of treatment and quality of care that is required in clinical trials. Cancer 2007. ยฉ 2007 American Cancer Society.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
A Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study I n their recent article, Coyne et al. 1 vastly overstated the quality of their study and the meaning of their findings. ## Poor Measurement They used only 4 items from an Emotional Well-Being subscale, which hardly constitutes a reliable assessment of dep
The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group conducts large-scale prospective, randomized trials to test new concepts in cancer patient care and provide information about pretreatment and treatment factors that may influence outcome. ## METHODS. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used to examine t
Between March 1973 and June 1979, patients with advanced operable squamous cell carcinoma of the supraglottic larynx or hypopharynx were randomly allocated to receive either preoperative radiation therapy (5,000 rad) or postoperative radiation therapy (6,000 rad). Patients with oral cavity or oropha
A group of 154 patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer, treated with platinum-based induction chemotherapy, were followed up for 5 years and several pretreatment characteristics were analyzed for possible correlation to a complete response (CR) to chemotherapy, time to progression (TTP)
## Background: The aim was to evaluate the relationship between nutrition support (ns) on host toxicity and cancer outcome in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (hnscc) undergoing definitive radiotherapy (xrt). ## Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of rad