𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Effects of preinteraction expectancies on interaction involvement and behavioral responses in initial interaction

✍ Scribed by James M. Honeycutt


Publisher
Springer US
Year
1989
Tongue
English
Weight
634 KB
Volume
13
Category
Article
ISSN
1573-3653

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The interaction of retail density and mu
✍ Sevgin A. Eroglu; Karen A. Machleit; Jean-Charles Chebat πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2005 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 89 KB

## Abstract Research examining the effects of store environment on shoppers has found that a number of atmospheric cues have significant effects on shoppers' cognitive, affective, and behavioral responses. To date, retail atmospheric cues have been studied in isolation, instead of simultaneously, l

Effects Of Initial Geometric Imperfectio
✍ S. Sassi; G.L. Ostiguy πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1994 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 365 KB

The influence of initial geometric imperfections on the response of simply supported rectangular plates subjected to periodic in-plane forces is theoretically analyzed in this work. The large deflection plate theory used in the analysis is derived in terms of the stress function \(F\) and lateral di

Effects of chlorpromazine and three meta
✍ Herbert Barry; Marie L. Steenberg; Albert A. Manian; Joseph P. Buckley πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1974 πŸ› Springer 🌐 English βš– 600 KB

Effects of chlorpromazine (CPZ) and three metabolites (3,7-dihydroxy-CPZ; 7,8-dihydroxy-CPZ; 7-hydroxy-CPZ) on behavioral performance of rats were tested by three methods: (a) continuous nondiseriminative lever-pressing shockavoidance response without a warning signal; (b) discriminative pole-climbi

Holding onto power: effects of powerhold
✍ John Georgesen; Monica J. Harris πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 134 KB

## Abstract This study explores the effects of power, positional threat, and expectancies on interactions between powerholders and subordinates. Two hundred and forty‐two participants were randomly assigned to power role (boss or employee). Bosses were further randomly assigned to levels of positio