๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Effects of other-profitability and self-profitability on evaluative judgements of behaviours

โœ Scribed by Roos Vonk


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1999
Tongue
English
Weight
115 KB
Volume
29
Category
Article
ISSN
0046-2772

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Behaviours are judged by their causes (i.e. the actor's intentions) as well as by their consequences. The present study focuses on the eects of the latter. Subjects judged behaviours that were either socially good, socially bad, competent, or incompetent. The consequences of the behaviours were either (a) personal consequences for the actor, (b) interpersonal consequences for others, or (c) not mentioned. Behaviours with interpersonal consequences were judged more extremely than with personal consequences. When no consequences were mentioned, the behaviours were rated similarly as in the condition with interpersonal consequences. These eects emerged regardless of behaviour valence ( positive versus negative) and dimension (social versus competencerelated). The results suggest that others' behaviours are judged primarily by their interpersonal implications, and that observers take the perspective of those whose outcomes may be aected by the actor.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Dynamic effects of learning capabilities
โœ Bowon Kim ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 178 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

Firms' long-term competitiveness depends on their capability of attaining product and/or process innovations that enable them to appropriate extraordinary rents for a certain period of time. In this paper, we investigate a dynamic interplay between "rms' learning capabilities, market reward structur

The effect of comparative context on cen
โœ Bertjan Doosje; S. Alexander Haslam; Russell Spears; Penelope J. Oakes; Willem K ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 184 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

A study is reported that examines the eects of comparative context on central tendency and variability judgements of groups, and the evaluation of group characteristics. The central assumption is that these social judgements are not absolute, but depend on the social context in which they are ground