Self-categorization theory posits that the perception of group members is flexible and determined by the comparative social context as well as by group membership. Subjects read about either four ingroup or outgroup target persons in the context of four additional stimulus persons who were members o
The effect of comparative context on central tendency and variability judgements and the evaluation of group characteristics
โ Scribed by Bertjan Doosje; S. Alexander Haslam; Russell Spears; Penelope J. Oakes; Willem Koomen
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 184 KB
- Volume
- 28
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0046-2772
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
A study is reported that examines the eects of comparative context on central tendency and variability judgements of groups, and the evaluation of group characteristics. The central assumption is that these social judgements are not absolute, but depend on the social context in which they are grounded. It is demonstrated that people vary their description of the ingroup in terms of central tendency and group variability as a function of the possibility of comparing the ingroup favourably with other groups in the judgemental task. In a similar vein, it is shown that the evaluation of an ingroup characteristic is not ยฎxed, but depends on its relative favourability within the comparative context. The results of this study clearly demonstrate the importance of comparative context in group perception and are discussed with reference to self-categorization theory and alternative models of social judgement.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES