๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

The effect of comparative context on central tendency and variability judgements and the evaluation of group characteristics

โœ Scribed by Bertjan Doosje; S. Alexander Haslam; Russell Spears; Penelope J. Oakes; Willem Koomen


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1998
Tongue
English
Weight
184 KB
Volume
28
Category
Article
ISSN
0046-2772

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


A study is reported that examines the eects of comparative context on central tendency and variability judgements of groups, and the evaluation of group characteristics. The central assumption is that these social judgements are not absolute, but depend on the social context in which they are grounded. It is demonstrated that people vary their description of the ingroup in terms of central tendency and group variability as a function of the possibility of comparing the ingroup favourably with other groups in the judgemental task. In a similar vein, it is shown that the evaluation of an ingroup characteristic is not ยฎxed, but depends on its relative favourability within the comparative context. The results of this study clearly demonstrate the importance of comparative context in group perception and are discussed with reference to self-categorization theory and alternative models of social judgement.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The effects of group membership and soci
โœ Heather Young; Ad Van Knippenberg; Naomi Ellemers; Nanne De Vries ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 181 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

Self-categorization theory posits that the perception of group members is flexible and determined by the comparative social context as well as by group membership. Subjects read about either four ingroup or outgroup target persons in the context of four additional stimulus persons who were members o