## Abstract A simple, inexpensive and reliable analytical method was developed for the determination of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottled beverage using GC‐MS. The sample pretreatment using dispersive solid‐phase extraction (DSPE) for removing matrix
Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction followed by reversed phase HPLC for the determination of decabrominated diphenyl ether in natural water
✍ Scribed by Yanyan Li; Jia Hu; Xiujuan Liu; Lingyan Fu; Xiaojun Zhang; Xuedong Wang
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 543 KB
- Volume
- 31
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1615-9306
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
A simple, rapid, and efficient method, dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME), has been developed for the extraction and preconcentration of decabrominated diphenyl ether (BDE‐209) in environmental water samples. The factors relevant to the microextraction efficiency, such as the kind and volume of extraction and dispersive solvent, the extraction time, and the salt effect, were optimized. Under the optimum conditions (extraction solvent: tetrachloroethane, volume, 22.0 μL; dispersive solvent: THF, volume, 1.00 mL; extraction time: below 5 s and without salt addition), the most time‐consuming step is the centrifugation of the sample solution in the extraction procedure, which is about 2 min. In this method, the enrichment factor could be as high as 153 in 5.00 mL water sample, and the linear range, correlation coefficient (r^2^), detection limit (S/N = 3), and precision (RSD, n = 6) were 0.001–0.5 μg/mL, 0.9999, 0.2 ng/mL, and 2.1%, respectively. This method was successfully applied to the extraction of BDE‐209 from tap, East Lake, and Yangtse River water samples; the relative recoveries were 95.8, 92.9, and 89.9% and the RSD% (n = 3) were 1.9, 2.7, and 3.5%, respectively. Comparison of this method with other methods, such as solid‐phase microextraction (SPME), and single‐drop microextraction (SDME), indicates that DLLME is a simple, fast, and low‐cost method for the determination of BDE‐209, and thus has tremendous potential in polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) residual analysis in environmental water samples.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
A simple dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction method combined with HPLC-photodiode array detection has been developed for the determination of phenylurea herbicides in water samples. The herbicides studied included tebuthiuron, diuron, propanil, fluometuron, siduron, linuron, thidiazuron, and di
## Dynamic liquid-phase microextraction with HPLC for the determination of phoxim in water samples A new method, which involves dynamic liquid-phase microextraction followed by HPLC with variable wavelength detection, was developed to determine phoxim in water samples. Experimental parameters affec
## Abstract A new method was developed for determination of methomyl in water samples by combining a dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) technique with HPLC–variable wavelength detection (VWD). In this extraction method, 0.50 mL of methanol (as dispersive solvent) containing 20.0 μL of
## Abstract A novel dispersive liquid‐phase microextraction method without dispersive solvents has been developed for the enrichment and sensitive determination of triclosan and triclocarban in environmental water samples prior to HPLC‐ESI‐MS/MS. This method used only green solvent 1‐hexyl‐3‐methyl
## Abstract This paper describes a new method for rapid and sensitive determination of diflubenzuron, flufenoxuron, triflumuron and chlorfluazuron in water samples by ultrasound‐assisted ionic liquid dispersive liquid‐phase microextraction in combination with HPLC. Ionic liquid 1‐hexyl‐3‐methylimid