## Abstract Resistance to hormonal therapy is often a problem in the treatment of breast cancer patients. It has been suggested that resistance could be explained by altered nuclear hormone receptor or coregulator levels or inappropriately increased agonist activity of selective estrogen receptor m
Differential response to phytoestrogens in endocrine sensitive and resistant breast cancer cells in vitro
✍ Scribed by Jane L. Limer; Alicia T. Parkes; Valerie Speirs
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- French
- Weight
- 184 KB
- Volume
- 119
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0020-7136
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Women approaching menopause increasingly investigate alternatives to hormone replacement therapy. Plant phytoestrogens are being promoted as “natural” alternatives but there is a lack of substantive data to advocate their safe use in breast cancer patients receiving tamoxifen (TAM), or in those who have relapsed. The aim of our study was to investigate the proliferative effects and mode of action of the phytoestrogens genistein, daidzein and coumestrol on TAM‐sensitive (‐s) and resistant (‐r) breast cancer cells under in vitro conditions designed to mimic the hormonal environment of the pre‐ and post‐menopausal breast. At physiological concentrations (<10 μM) and under reduced estrogen (E2) conditions, genistein was mitogenic to TAM‐s cells with TAM‐r cells generally refractory. Daidzein and coumestrol were growth stimulatory irrespective of TAM sensitivity. Transcriptional activity was ERE‐mediated. Combining phytoestrogens with E2 (simulating the pre‐menopausal breast environment) had no effect on growth of TAM‐s or TAM‐r cells. Addition of 4‐HT mimicked the hormonal environment in post‐menopausal breast cancer patients receiving TAM. The growth inhibitory effects of 4‐HT were abrogated in TAM‐s cells when combined with genistein and coumestrol, and to a lesser extent, daidzein, where significant growth stimulatory effects were observed. In TAM‐r cells, proliferation did not exceed control values. At phytoestrogen concentrations above 10 μM, growth inhibitory effects were seen, irrespective of estrogenic environment or cell sensitivity to TAM. Our in vitro data suggests that phytoestrogens could have potentially adverse mitogenic effects on tumour cells and should probably be avoided by patients who remain sensitive to TAM or in those with pre‐existing and possibly undiagnosed breast tumours. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
We have previously demonstrated that elevated Fos expression may be important in de novo endocrine resistance in breast cancer. However, changes in Fos expression during endocrine response and subsequently on acquisition of resistance are unknown. This study immunocytochemically monitors Fos protein
DIFFERENTIAL CYTOTOXIC SENSITIVITY OF HUMAN NORMAL AND TUMOR CELLS 599 TABLE I -CHARACTERISTICS OF THE INVESTIGATED HUMAN CELL TYPES' ~ Cell type Origin Characteristic Type of culture Growth rate in vifro exDreSS,On Pgp, ACHN LO Lloo Fibroblasts Lymphocytes CLL, AML Cells from solid tnmors Kidney ad
## Abstract Plant‐derived phytoestrogens and estrogens in hormone replacement therapies have overlapping yet sometimes divergent effects on the incidence of breast cancer and osteoporosis. Using human MCF‐7 breast carcinoma and G‐292 osteosarcoma cell lines, it was investigated whether the phytoest
## Abstract __This article has been retracted at the request of__: Editor‐in‐Chief and Co‐author ‘Restoring sensitivity to oxaliplatin by a novel approach in gemcitabine‐resistant pancreatic cancer cells __in vitro__ and __in vivo__’ by Banerjee, S., Kong, D., Azmi, A. S., Wang, Z., Ahmad, A., Set