๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Diagnostic criteria and cancer risk of proliferative breast lesions

โœ Scribed by Roy A. Jensen; William D. Dupont; David L. Page


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1993
Tongue
English
Weight
649 KB
Volume
53
Category
Article
ISSN
0730-2312

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Breast cancer risk assessment in women following a benign breast biopsy is a promising area with regard to intermediate endpoint determination, and has been particularly fostered by the consensus agreement concerning the risk attributed to specific diagnoses [l]. Several recent studies have largely verified this approach 12-41, and a recent report demonstrates general agreement among most expert pathologists regarding diagnostic criteria for these lesions [51. However, in a limited number of cases, determining exact levels of risk for individual patients has been problematic as a result of a failure by pathologists to achieve consensus on diagnostic criteria for these same lesions. This situation has arisen primarily because it is much more tenable to disagree over subjective diagnostic criteria, than it is to argue with robustly supported epidemiological data. Without agreement on reproducible diagnostic criteria, widely promulgated consensus risk estimates for these specific histologic entities are no longer applicable. In addition, those individuals who choose different diagnostic criteria for proliferative breast lesions fail to realize that the terminology, epidemiological risk estimates, and diagnostic criteria used by Dupont and Page are inexorably linked. Since the publication of the consensus statement [l], those using the terms "atypical ductal hyperplasia" and "atypical lobular hyperplasia" have by default accepted the diagnostic criteria of Dupont and Page. Therefore, surgical pathologists who desire to make use of the consensus risk estimates must familiarize themselves with diagnostic criteria for the various histologic entities that comprise proliferative disease of the breast as defined by Dupont and Page [6]. This presentation will concentrate on the importance of a combined histologic and cytologic approach to diagnose proliferative breast lesions, and will specifically focus on usual hyperplasia, atypical ductal hyperplasia, atypical lobular hyperplasia, and both ductal and lobular carcinoma in sifu.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Breast cancer risk associated with proli
โœ William D. Dupont; Fritz F. Parl; William H. Hartmann; Louise A. Brinton; Alan C ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1993 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 754 KB

Background. Women with proliferative breast disease (PD) have been observed to have an increased risk of breast cancer. The authors evaluated the effect of PD on breast cancer risk in a case-control study among participants of the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project (BCDDP). Methods. More

A comparison of reproductive risk factor
โœ Jan Wohlfahrt; Fritz Rank; Niels Kroman; Mads Melbye ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2003 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ French โš– 72 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

## Abstract A differential effect of reproductive factors on the incidence of carcinoma __in situ__ of the breast (CIS) and invasive cancer may indicate that hormonal factors related to reproductive history not only influence the initial steps towards breast cancer but also preinvasive malignant le