𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Corporate power in universities opposed

✍ Scribed by Pennisi, Elizabeth

Book ID
109751578
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
Year
1987
Tongue
English
Weight
160 KB
Volume
330
Category
Article
ISSN
0028-0836

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Measurement and evaluation in corporate
Measurement and evaluation in corporate universities
✍ Mark Allen; Philip McGee πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2004 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons βš– 66 KB

## Abstract Corporate universities have developed a variety of useful and creative methods for mission‐specific evaluation.

The utilization of training program eval
The utilization of training program evaluation in corporate universities
✍ Christopher F. Bober; Kenneth R. Bartlett πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2004 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 132 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract This study examined the use of training program evaluation results in corporate universities. Specifically, the study attempted to determine which organizational members use evaluation data, and for what purposes, and identify the factors that are related to the use of evaluation result

Feelings of power in a corporate society
Feelings of power in a corporate society
✍ Ronald S. Burt πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1977 πŸ› Springer Netherlands 🌐 English βš– 911 KB

One aspect of the well-being of individuals in society is the extent to which they feel that they have the power to affect their well-being within the society. Coleman (1973b) specifies such a feeling of power as a function of the ability to control events in those arenas of action which are of high

Invited reaction: The utilization of tra
Invited reaction: The utilization of training program evaluation in corporate universities
✍ Rosalie T. Torres πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2004 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 49 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract This reaction piece briefly reviews the findings from the Bober and Bartlett study of training evaluation use in corporate universities. It then focuses on the importance of context in understanding and facilitating evaluation use. The author suggests an alternative interpretation of pa