๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Feelings of power in a corporate society

โœ Scribed by Ronald S. Burt


Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Year
1977
Tongue
English
Weight
911 KB
Volume
4
Category
Article
ISSN
0303-8300

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


One aspect of the well-being of individuals in society is the extent to which they feel that they have the power to affect their well-being within the society. Coleman (1973b) specifies such a feeling of power as a function of the ability to control events in those arenas of action which are of high interest to the individual. In advanced societies, control of resources has shifted into the hands of corporate actors so that those arenas of action which are of interest to corporate actors are dominated by corporate actors rather than individual persons. The following proposition can therefore be deduced: persons interested in the arenas of action of interest to corporate actors will have lower feelings of power over their well-being than will persons predominantly interested in arenas of action of little or no interest to corporate actors. Using a national probability sample of households in the United States, this proposition is assessed both directly and after controlling for confounding influences of exogenous concepts. The proposition can be rejected as erroneous unless respondent differences in socioeconomic states are controlled. Respondent differences in major demographic characteristics do not greatly affect the proposition.

l. INTRODUCTION

You and I live in a society in which we are second-class citizens. Our inferior states is not determined by differences in race or sex. Rather, we are secondclass citizens because you and I are humans. Our role in advanced industrial society is to serve the dominant species -corporate bureaucracies. We serve by working efficiently for them, not complaining too loudly when they force us to waste time in lines waiting to interact with them, and in general by allowing their interests to guide the course of events in society. This paper is a discussion of one of the psychic consequences of persons coping with life in such a society -the loss of a feeling of power over individual well-being.

The conceptualization of the overall well-being of individuals within a society entails the elaboration of three different facets of well-being. One facet -the most widely researched -concerns the levels of satisfaction individuals derive from existing societal conditions. I A second facet concerns the cultural framework, the 'structure of well-being', in terms of which individuals evaluate the satisfaction they derive from existing societal condi-


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Feelings in a system of moral values
โœ Alexander I. Titarenko ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› Springer ๐ŸŒ English โš– 826 KB
Corporate legitimacy in risk society: th
โœ Jesper Grolin ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 166 KB

The aim of this paper is to understand what lessons on corporate legitimacy can be drawn from the Shell -Greenpeace conflict in 1995 about the dumping of the Brent Spar oil storage platform in the North-East Atlantic. Based on theories of corporate legitimacy and risk society, it is argued that the