## Abstract This reaction piece briefly reviews the findings from the Bober and Bartlett study of training evaluation use in corporate universities. It then focuses on the importance of context in understanding and facilitating evaluation use. The author suggests an alternative interpretation of pa
The utilization of training program evaluation in corporate universities
β Scribed by Christopher F. Bober; Kenneth R. Bartlett
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2004
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 132 KB
- Volume
- 15
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1044-8004
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
This study examined the use of training program evaluation results in corporate universities. Specifically, the study attempted to determine which organizational members use evaluation data, and for what purposes, and identify the factors that are related to the use of evaluation results. The study was designed to test the appropriateness of the Cousins and Leithwood (1986) metaβanalytic conceptual framework for evaluation utilization. A case study approach was used to collect qualitative data at four corporate universities in the United States. Onβsite interviews with key personnel and inβdepth document review of applicable training program evaluation information were conducted. Results showed a high degree of consensus on evaluation uses and users. Seven of the twelve factors from the Cousins and Leithwood framework were found at all four sites to influence utilization. The findings indicate that factors identified as being influential to evaluation utilization related to implementation dominated over factors related to uses for decision/policy setting.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract This study analyzes the employment effects of training in East Germany. We propose and apply an extension of the widely used conditional differenceβinβdifferences estimator. Focusing on transition rates between nonemployment and employment, we take into account that employment is a stat
A training programme in psychogeriatrics was run for 51 primary health care doctors, nurses and social workers split into two groups for training in two formats. One group was a patient-case group and the other a lecture group. The participants were interviewed 2 4 months after the course and the m