Comparison of the signal-to-noise ratio at 1.5 and 2.0 T using a whole-body system
✍ Scribed by N. Beckmann; S. Müller; J. Seelig
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1989
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 159 KB
- Volume
- 9
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0740-3194
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## Purpose To evaluate the signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), precision, and accuracy of phase‐contrast flow measurements at 3 T with the help of an in vitro model and to compare the results with data from two 1.5‐T scanners. ## Materials and Methods Using an identical setup of a laminar f
## Abstract ## Purpose To compare different MRI‐derived parameters, i.e., liver signal‐to‐noise ratio (LSNR), liver‐to‐muscle ratio (LMR) and liver transversal relaxation rate (R2), in terms of their correlation with the ex vivo determined iron content in an experimental model of liver iron overlo
## Abstract ## Purpose To compare 3.0T and 1.5T MR systems in terms of the effect of superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) on tumor‐to‐liver contrast in T2\*‐weighted gradient‐echo MRI. ## Materials and Methods SPIO‐enhanced gradient‐echo MR images of the liver with four different TEs (3, 5.3, 6.5
## Abstract Large variations of tip angle within a slice can lead to suboptimal pulse power optimization using standard techniques, which measure the average tip angle over a slice; this effect is especially pronounced at fields of 7 T and above. A technique was introduced that performed a volume‐s
The Fig. 3 was incorrect. It was same as the FIG. 2. The error had been made during the last stages of submitting publication-quality figures. The reviewers had seen the correct figure. The correct figure and legend is reprinted below. FIG. 3. Plots of the contrast ratio of the Gd concentrations at