✦ LIBER ✦

Erratum to: Morita, et al., Enhancement effects of hepatic dynamic MR imaging at 3.0 T and 1.5 T using gadoxetic acid in a phantom study: Comparison with gadopentetate dimeglumine

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 2011
Tongue: English
Weight: 225 KB
Volume: 66
Category: Article
ISSN: 0740-3194
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22895

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis

The Fig. 3 was incorrect. It was same as the FIG. 2. The error had been made during the last stages of submitting publication-quality figures. The reviewers had seen the correct figure. The correct figure and legend is reprinted below. FIG. 3. Plots of the contrast ratio of the Gd concentrations at different flip angles at 2D-FLASH. a: Gadoxetic acid at 3.0 T (b) Gadopentetate dimeglumine at 3.0 T (c) Gadoxetic acid at 1.5 T (d) Gadopentetate dimeglumine at 1.5 T.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Enhancement effects of hepatic dynamic M

Enhancement effects of hepatic dynamic MR imaging at 3.0 T and 1.5 T using gadoxetic acid in a phantom study: comparison with gadopentetate dimeglumine

✍ Kosuke Morita; Tomohiro Namimoto; Kazuo Awai; Masanori Komi; Masahiro Hashida; T 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 495 KB

## Abstract To identify the optimum sequence at gadoxetic acid enhanced hepatic dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in the arterial phase, we studied phantoms that contained gadoxetic acid or gadopentetate dimeglumine diluted in human blood. We obtained magnetic resonance images at 3.0 T and 1.5 T w