Comparison of electrospray ionization and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization techniques in the analysis of the main constituents from Rhodiola rosea extracts by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry

✍ Scribed by Ari Tolonen; Anja Hohtola; Jorma Jalonen

• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
• Year: 2003
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 182 KB
• Volume: 38
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 1076-5174
• DOI: 10.1002/jms.497

✦ Synopsis

Abstract

Rhodiola rosea L. (Golden Root) has been used for a long time as an adaptogen in Chinese traditional medicine and is reported to have many pharmacological properties. A liquid chromatographic (LC) method with mass spectrometric (MS) detection based on selected ion monitoring (SIM) was developed for determining salidroside, sachaliside 1, rosin, 4‐methoxycinnamyl‐O‐β‐glucopyranoside, rosarin, rosavin, cinnamyl‐(6′‐O‐β‐xylopyranosyl)‐O‐β‐glucopyranoside, 4‐methoxy‐cinnamyl‐(6′‐O‐α‐arabinopyranosyl)‐O‐β‐glucopyranoside, rosiridin and benzyl‐O‐β‐glucopyranoside from the callus and plant extracts in one chromatographic run. Good linearity over the range 0.5–500 ng ml^−1^ for salidroside, 2–2000 ng ml^−1^ for rosavin and 2–500 ng ml^−1^ for benzyl‐O‐β‐glucopyranoside was observed. The intra‐assay accuracy and precision within quantitation ranges varied between −10.0 and +13.2% and between 0.7 and 9.0%, respectively. Optimization of the ionization process was performed with electrospray and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization techniques using four different additive compositions for eluents in the LC/MS scan mode, using both positive and negative ion modes. The best ionization sensitivity for the compounds studied was obtained with electrospray ionization when using pure water without any additives as the aqueous phase. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.