We report our evaluation of the CASP3 comparative modelling competition. Our analysis covers the accuracy of the over-all fold, the bridging of insertions and deletions, and the adding of side-chains. We describe our attempts at automating aspects of the evaluation. Proteins
Comparing multiattribute evaluation process models
β Scribed by William D. Perreault Jr.; Frederick A. Russ
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1977
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 754 KB
- Volume
- 22
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 8756-6079
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
R&D project selection decision is very important in two ways. First, in many organizations, R&D budget represents huge investment. Project selection decisions could be thought with the strategic objectives and plans of the firm. Second, R&D projects' organizational returns are multidimensional in na
We evaluate homology-derived 3D models of dihydrofolate reductase (DFR 1 ), phosphotransferase enzyme IIA domain (PTE2A 3 ), and mouse/human UBC9 protein (UBC9 24 ) which were submitted to the second Meeting on the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (CASP). The DFR 1
Following the first experiment for the Critical Assessment of methods for protein Structure Prediction (CASP1), numerical criteria were devised to analyze the performance of prediction methods. We report here the criteria for comparative modeling, and how effective they were in CASP2. These criteria
The spatial modelling of small area health data has, for some time, included spatial autocorrelation as a random e ect. This e ect is non-speciΓΏc and global and does not address the location of clusters of disease (a speciΓΏc task). This paper addresses the need for speciΓΏc and non-speciΓΏc random e e