𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propranolol and atenolol in normolipaemic and hyperlipidaemic obese subjects

✍ Scribed by Jerzy Wójcicki; Maria Jaroszynska; Marek Droździk; Andrzej Pawlik; Barbara Gawrońska-Szklarz; Rozalia Sterna


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
96 KB
Volume
24
Category
Article
ISSN
0142-2782

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

The lipophilic beta‐adrenoreceptor antagonist propranolol and hydrophilic atenolol have been studied to define their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics in obese patients. A total of 43 subjects were allocated into three study groups: (1) healthy, lean, normolipaemic volunteers, (2) obese normolipaemic subjects, and (3) obese patients with lipid disorders. A crossover method with an interval of 2 weeks was applied for oral 80 mg propranolol and oral 100 mg atenolol administration. Heart rate as well as systolic and diastolic blood pressure were recorded during 24 h. At each time‐point of measurement blood serum concentration of propranolol and atenolol were evaluated. Pharmacokinetic parameters of the drugs were calculated using a one‐compartment open model for extravascular administration. There were no statistically significant differences in blood serum concentrations of propranolol between the studied groups. The concentrations of atenolol were significantly lower in both normolipaemic and hyperlipidaemic obese subjects. A trend towards increase in __V__d/F and Cl/F of propranolol in obese patients with hyperlipidaemia were noted. In the case of water‐soluble atenolol, the AUC, C~max~, Cl/(F×BW) were significantly lower in obese hyperlipidaemic and normolipaemic patients in comparison with lean subjects. The pharmacodynamic effects of propranolol and atenolol in obese and lean subjects were of similar magnitude. The observed differences between obese and non‐obese persons were clinically not relevant. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


A study of the pharmacokinetics and phar
✍ T. J. Fitzsimons; S. C. Norris; H. K. Adam; J. Ryan; J. McAinsh 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 469 KB 👁 2 views

This double-blind randomized, crossover study was undertaken to determine the pharmacokinetic properties of nifedipine retard and atenolol when given separately, as a free or a fixed combination, compared with placebo in 15 healthy male volunteers. There was no difference between the three atenolol

Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmac
✍ Sonia Guimont; Dr Hélène Landriault; Keith Klischer; Michael Grace; Chantal Lamb 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 586 KB

CardizemOSR and Bi-TildiemO were both approved in their respective countries on the basis of clinical trials demonstrating efficacy and safety in the treatment of angina pectoris. In this cross-over randomized study, we assessed whether these two sustained-release formulations of diltiazem have equi

Comparative pharmacokinetics of midazola
✍ R. Jochemsen; P. A. Van Rijn; T. G. M. Hazelzet; C. J. Van Boxtel; D. D. Breimer 📂 Article 📅 1986 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 397 KB 👁 1 views

The pharmacokinetics of oral midazolam (Dormicum@, 15 mg) and loprazolam (Dormonoct@, 1 mg) were studied in eight healthy young volunteers in a cross-over design. Plasma concentrations of midazolam were measured with a gas chromatographic method and loprazolam concentrations were determined by a rad