## Purpose: To differentiate prostate carcinoma from healthy peripheral zone and central gland using quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced (dce) magnetic resonance (mr) imaging and two-dimensional (1)h mr spectroscopic imaging (mrsi) combined into one clinical protocol. ## Materials and methods:
Combined dynamic contrast enhanced breast MR and proton spectroscopic imaging: A feasibility study
✍ Scribed by Michael A. Jacobs; Peter B. Barker; Pedram Argani; Ronald Ouwerkerk; Zaver M. Bhujwalla; David A. Bluemke
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2004
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 412 KB
- Volume
- 21
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1053-1807
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Purpose
To investigate the feasibility of combined dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) in evaluating breast lesions.
Methods
Nine patients with positive mammograms scheduled for either biopsy or mastectomy were examined on a 1.5‐T MR scanner. DCE was performed with administration of gadolinium‐DTPA contrast using a two‐dimensional spoiled gradient recall echo (SPGR) sequence. Proton spectroscopy (TR/TE = 2000/272 msec) was performed using PRESS single slice (10 mm). Lesion time intensity curves were classified as persistent (type 1), plateau (type 2), or washout (type 3) pattern enhancement. Choline (Cho) signal‐to‐noise ratios (SNRs) and enhancement patterns were compared between benign and malignant lesions as determined by histopathology.
Results
Five patients had breast carcinoma and four had benign lesions. Type 1 enhancement was found in two benign cases, type 2 enhancement in two of four benign and four of five malignant lesions, and one malignant case exhibited a type 3 pattern. Choline SNR was significantly different (P < 0.003) between benign and malignant lesions (2.0 ± 0.3 vs. 5.7 ± 1.4; P < 0.003). Choline SNR was less than 4.0 in all of the benign lesions, including the two lesions with type 2 enhancement.
Conclusion
Proton MRS appears to be a promising technique for classification of breast lesions when DCE results are equivocal. A combination of DCE and MRS is feasible, and may have improved specificity compared to either modality alone. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2005;21:23–28. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a combination of dynamic contrast‐enhanced MR imaging (DCE‐MRI) and diffusion‐weighted MR imaging (DWI) in characterization of enhanced mass on breast MR imaging and to find the strongest discriminators between carcinoma and benignancy.
## Abstract ## Purpose: To develop and evaluate a computerized segmentation method for breast MRI (BMRI) mass‐lesions. ## Materials and Methods: A computerized segmentation algorithm was developed to segment mass‐like‐lesions on breast MRI. The segmentation algorithm involved: (i) interactive le
## Abstract ## Purpose To investigate the diagnostic value of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) in patients with breast lesions. ## Materials and Methods Eighteen patients underwent breast MRSI and MRI at 1.5 T. Contrast‐enhanced MR was used to identify the lesion, after whi
A method is presented that converts dynamic T 1 -weighted spoiled gradient-recalled echo (SGRE) image intensities into estimates of T 1 without the errors associated with imperfections in the slice profile and transmitter coil magnetic field (B 1 ). The method involves T 1 measurements performed bef