## Abstract ## Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a combination of dynamic contrast‐enhanced MR imaging (DCE‐MRI) and diffusion‐weighted MR imaging (DWI) in characterization of enhanced mass on breast MR imaging and to find the strongest discriminators between carcinoma and benignancy.
Robust segmentation of mass-lesions in contrast-enhanced dynamic breast MR images
✍ Scribed by Lina A. Meinel; Thomas Buelow; Dezheng Huo; Akiko Shimauchi; Ursula Kose; Johannes Buurman; Gillian Newstead
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 475 KB
- Volume
- 32
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1053-1807
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Purpose:
To develop and evaluate a computerized segmentation method for breast MRI (BMRI) mass‐lesions.
Materials and Methods:
A computerized segmentation algorithm was developed to segment mass‐like‐lesions on breast MRI. The segmentation algorithm involved: (i) interactive lesion selection, (ii) automatic intensity threshold estimation, (iii) connected component analysis, and (iv) a postprocessing procedure for hole‐filling and leakage removal. Seven observers manually traced the borders of all slices of 30 mass‐lesions using the same tools. To initiate the computerized segmentation, each user selected a seed‐point for each lesion interactively using two methods: direct seed‐point and robust region of interest (ROI) selections. The manual and computerized segmentations were compared pair‐wise using the measured size and overlap to evaluate similarity, and the reproducibility of the computerized segmentation was compared with the interobserver variability of the manual delineations.
Results:
The observed inter‐ and intraobserver variations were similar (P > 0.05). Computerized segmentation using the robust ROI selection method was significantly (P < 0.001) more reproducible in measuring lesion size (stDev 1.8%) than either manual contouring (11.7%) or computerized segmentation using directly placed seed‐point method (13.7%).
Conclusion:
The computerized segmentation method using robust ROI selection is more reproducible than manual delineation in terms of measuring the size of a mass‐lesion. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010;32:110–119. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## Purpose To investigate the correlation between MR findings and the histological diagnosis of incidentally detected lesions in candidates for breast‐conserving therapy. ## Materials and Methods MR images of 299 patients with breast cancer were reviewed. Incidentally detected lesion
## Abstract ## Purpose To compare the diagnostic performance of breast lesions by the enhancement patterns and morphologic criteria on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). ## Materials and Methods Both T1‐weighted 3D gradient‐echo sequences with high temporal resolution and high‐spatial‐resolution
A multiparametric computer-aided diagnosis scheme that combines information from T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI and T2-weighted MRI was investigated using a database of 110 malignant and 86 benign breast lesions. Automatic lesion segmentation was performed, and three categories of l