𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Robust segmentation of mass-lesions in contrast-enhanced dynamic breast MR images

✍ Scribed by Lina A. Meinel; Thomas Buelow; Dezheng Huo; Akiko Shimauchi; Ursula Kose; Johannes Buurman; Gillian Newstead


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
475 KB
Volume
32
Category
Article
ISSN
1053-1807

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Purpose:

To develop and evaluate a computerized segmentation method for breast MRI (BMRI) mass‐lesions.

Materials and Methods:

A computerized segmentation algorithm was developed to segment mass‐like‐lesions on breast MRI. The segmentation algorithm involved: (i) interactive lesion selection, (ii) automatic intensity threshold estimation, (iii) connected component analysis, and (iv) a postprocessing procedure for hole‐filling and leakage removal. Seven observers manually traced the borders of all slices of 30 mass‐lesions using the same tools. To initiate the computerized segmentation, each user selected a seed‐point for each lesion interactively using two methods: direct seed‐point and robust region of interest (ROI) selections. The manual and computerized segmentations were compared pair‐wise using the measured size and overlap to evaluate similarity, and the reproducibility of the computerized segmentation was compared with the interobserver variability of the manual delineations.

Results:

The observed inter‐ and intraobserver variations were similar (P > 0.05). Computerized segmentation using the robust ROI selection method was significantly (P < 0.001) more reproducible in measuring lesion size (stDev 1.8%) than either manual contouring (11.7%) or computerized segmentation using directly placed seed‐point method (13.7%).

Conclusion:

The computerized segmentation method using robust ROI selection is more reproducible than manual delineation in terms of measuring the size of a mass‐lesion. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010;32:110–119. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breas
✍ Hidetake Yabuuchi; Yoshio Matsuo; Takashi Okafuji; Takeshi Kamitani; Hiroyasu So 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 282 KB

## Abstract ## Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a combination of dynamic contrast‐enhanced MR imaging (DCE‐MRI) and diffusion‐weighted MR imaging (DWI) in characterization of enhanced mass on breast MR imaging and to find the strongest discriminators between carcinoma and benignancy.

Incidentally detected lesions on contras
✍ Hidetake Yabuuchi; Toshiro Kuroiwa; Chie Kusumoto; Tatsuro Fukuya; Shinji Ohno; 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 297 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract ## Purpose To investigate the correlation between MR findings and the histological diagnosis of incidentally detected lesions in candidates for breast‐conserving therapy. ## Materials and Methods MR images of 299 patients with breast cancer were reviewed. Incidentally detected lesion

Diagnosis of breast tumors by contrast-e
✍ Mariko Goto; Hirotoshi Ito; Kentaro Akazawa; Takao Kubota; Osamu Kizu; Kei Yamad 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 322 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract ## Purpose To compare the diagnostic performance of breast lesions by the enhancement patterns and morphologic criteria on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). ## Materials and Methods Both T1‐weighted 3D gradient‐echo sequences with high temporal resolution and high‐spatial‐resolution

Combined use of T2-weighted MRI and T1-w
✍ Neha Bhooshan; Maryellen Giger; Li Lan; Hui Li; Angelica Marquez; Akiko Shimauch 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 490 KB 👁 1 views

A multiparametric computer-aided diagnosis scheme that combines information from T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI and T2-weighted MRI was investigated using a database of 110 malignant and 86 benign breast lesions. Automatic lesion segmentation was performed, and three categories of l