๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Choices and opportunities: another effect of framing on decisions

โœ Scribed by Steven K. Jones; Deborah Frisch; Tricia J. Yurak; Eric Kim


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1998
Tongue
English
Weight
181 KB
Volume
11
Category
Article
ISSN
0894-3257

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Many decisions can be framed either as choices' between alternative courses of action (e.g. Should I move to New York or stay in Chicago?) or as opportunities' to pursue a particular course of action (i.e. Should I move to New York?). Although there is no logical dierence between these two dierent decision frames, there may be important psychological dierences between them. In four studies, we explore the dierences between choices' and opportunities'. The results of Studies 1 and 2 show that college students view many of the decisions they typically face as opportunities, rather than choices. Further, the results of Study 2 suggest that the frame students adopt is systematically related to the preferences they express. The latter ยฎnding led to Studies 3 and 4, where we show that preferences can be inยฏuenced by encouraging people to adopt one decision frame rather than another.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The effect of capitation on GPs' referra
โœ Tor Iversen; Hilde Lurรฅs ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 95 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

In the Norwegian capitation trial, the payment system for general practitioners (GPs) has been changed; a practice allowance component has been replaced by a capitation component and the fee-per-item component constitutes a smaller part of a GPs practice income than previously. From the theoretical

Framing reference points: the effect of
โœ Rachel Barkan; Shai Danziger; Guy Ben-Bashat; Jerome R. Busemeyer ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2005 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 114 KB

Dynamic inconsistency reflects a prediction bias where decision makers fail to follow their plans simply because they experience outcomes on which their plan was based. Specifically, after experiencing an anticipated gain in one gamble, decision makers reject a second gamble they had planned to acce

Framing the framing effect: the impact o
โœ Herbert Bless; Tilmann Betsch; Axel Franzen ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 117 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

Participants were exposed to the `Asian disease' problem (Tversky & Kahneman, 1981). When the problem was subtly framed as a medical decision problem previous ยฎndings were replicated: participants avoided the risky option when the problem was framed positively, but preferred the risky option when th