This book makes it clear that those societies that have the smallest dierences in income between rich and poor (Japan and Sweden are number 1 and number 2) have better health and greater life-expectancy. But health is not all: both are also lower in violent crime. Of those smaller numbers convicted
Book review: A community psychology perspective (II)
โ Scribed by David Fryer
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 71 KB
- Volume
- 8
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1052-9284
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
hope for another Bartley-style examination of the lessons from this debate over the relationship between research and policy.
I would also suggest that further work needs to take account of studies in equality which go beyond income distribution to take account of the additional resources often excluded or neglected in ocial statistics, e.g. the substantial widening resulting from the concentration of more than fringe beneยฎts among directors, employers and many higher-status employeesรthe `concealed multipliers of occupational success' as Richard Titmuss drily termed them over 40 years ago (Titmuss, 1958, p. 52). They are not simply add-ons to inequality but may increase when the conventionally accepted indicators show little or no change.
Despite these questions, the importance of this book cannot be overstated: the implications of its analyses are very considerable for social policy. If the distribution of the nation's resources is more important than their absolute growth, then the current economic orthodoxy is seriously ยฏawed. And the measurement of growth by quantitative rather than qualitative indicators only compounds the problem, neglecting the importance of the harder-to-measure `social capital'. The analysis provides strong support for closer attention to policies moderating the distribution of resources rather than their growth.
REFERENCES Bartley, M. (1992). Authorities and Partisans: The Debate on Unemployment and Health.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
British society'. But the conservatives ignore it altogether, while the Labour party prefers to concentrate on equality of opportunity (not of outcome) and on moving people from welfare to work. As long as the have-nots (who have fallen furthest behind during nearly two decades of laissez-faire mark
diculties with which domestic life has to cope and cannot be separated from a range of what are seen as family problems. It is not just that worries about money, jobs and housing spill over into domestic conยฏict . . .It is also that lack of money, of choices, play space, the need for enough indoor s