hope for another Bartley-style examination of the lessons from this debate over the relationship between research and policy. I would also suggest that further work needs to take account of studies in equality which go beyond income distribution to take account of the additional resources often exc
Book review: A community psychology perspective (I)
โ Scribed by George W. Albee
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 90 KB
- Volume
- 8
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1052-9284
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
This book makes it clear that those societies that have the smallest dierences in income between rich and poor (Japan and Sweden are number 1 and number 2) have better health and greater life-expectancy. But health is not all: both are also lower in violent crime. Of those smaller numbers convicted of crime in Japan, fewer than 2% serve jail sentences (compared with 45% in the USA). Japanese police are `teachers in the virtue of the law' (Bayley, 1976, p. 196 as quoted by Wilkinson, p. 169) who want to be known for their warmth, not their strictness! (Not a ยฎt script for American TV police drama!)
The basic message of the book is simple enough:
. . . life expectancy in dierent countries is dramatically improved where income dierences are smaller. Those societies are more socially cohesive . . . social, rather than material, factors are now the limiting component in the life of developed societies (p. 1).
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
This article explores some implications of recent epistemological revisions in community psychology, beginning with the developments of the community perspective and proceeding through its subsequent transformations. The changes produced from the shift from cybernetic models to dialogical models gen
British society'. But the conservatives ignore it altogether, while the Labour party prefers to concentrate on equality of opportunity (not of outcome) and on moving people from welfare to work. As long as the have-nots (who have fallen furthest behind during nearly two decades of laissez-faire mark
diculties with which domestic life has to cope and cannot be separated from a range of what are seen as family problems. It is not just that worries about money, jobs and housing spill over into domestic conยฏict . . .It is also that lack of money, of choices, play space, the need for enough indoor s