𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Biological value of the biomass and protein isolates from different yeasts

✍ Scribed by Charatjan, S. G. ;Wolnowa, A. I.


Book ID
102210232
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1975
Tongue
English
Weight
335 KB
Volume
19
Category
Article
ISSN
0027-769X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

The microbiological analysis with the test‐organism Tetrahymena pyriformis W can be used successfully to measure the relative nutritive value of the biomass and protein isolates from different yeasts for screening the groups of micro‐organisms to choose those of the desired quality. In general, this method is rapid, comparatively cheap and gives the possibility to test large numbers of samples simultaneously. According to the literature and our own results, the relative nutritive value, the percentage of absorbed “N”, retained by test‐organism and used for its growth and multiplication, expressed as cell count and given in relation to a standard protein (casein) is generally in a good agreement with results obtained with animals. This microbiological method is promising for investigating the influence of certain technological operations on the quality of protein. The investigation has been performed by the use of Baker's yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, of fodder yeast Candida, grown on oil hydrocarbons and on wood hydrolysates, yeasts Hansenula and Mycoderma, grown on a medium containing ethanol as the sole carbon source. The best results were obtained with the yeast grown on the ethanol‐containing medium. The biological value of the biomass of yeast Hansenula is 91% and of protein isolate 96% as related to casein as the standard protein.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Comparative studies on protein isolates
✍ Schwenke, K. D. ;Semionov, A. ;Raab, B. ;Sergejev, V. A. ;Besrukov, M. G. 📂 Article 📅 1980 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 507 KB

## Abstract Protein isolates prepared from yeasts by isoelectric precipitation and ultrafiltration, respectively, show differences in their solubility and gelchromatographic behaviour. The ultrafiltrated preparation represents a less aggregated protein. The SDS‐discelectrophoresis patterns are iden