๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Argumentation as dialectical

โœ Scribed by J. Anthony Blair; Ralph H. Johnson


Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Year
1987
Tongue
English
Weight
1015 KB
Volume
1
Category
Article
ISSN
0920-427X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


The authors describe the rationale behind a recent development in the teaching of logic in North America and sketch some features of a dialectical theory of logical criticism.

The authors argue that problems with validity and truth as the standards of logically compelling argument force abandonment of 20th century formal, deductive logic as an adequate theory of argument criticism. The latter's proper domain is implication, not argument. A new, dialectical theory of argument criticism is need.

The authors claim premises should meet a dialectical requirement of "acceptability" (in place of the soundness requirement of "truth") -one which invokes the conception of a community of model interlocutors to generate standards of appraisal. Premise-conclusion connections should meet dialectical requirements of relevance and sufficiency.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Counselling as a dialectical process
โœ Robert H. Short; Brian J. Boon ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1990 ๐Ÿ› Springer US ๐ŸŒ English โš– 911 KB

This paper attempts to merge the dialectical perspective within the framework of counselling psychology. Both objective and subjective approaches to counselling are reviewed and a synthetical solution is proposed which falls within the all-encompassing dialectical perspective. Dialectical psychology

Dialectic as methodological perspective
โœ Rosemary S. Bannan ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1984 ๐Ÿ› Springer Netherlands ๐ŸŒ English โš– 804 KB
Argument as inquiry and argument as pers
๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1989 ๐Ÿ› Springer Netherlands ๐ŸŒ English โš– 763 KB

Some theorists of argumentation seem to believe that we should consider the purpose of argumentation to be persuasion. Although persuasion is a purpose of argumentation on some occasions, we must recognize that argumentation can and does have another and equally important purpose, namely inquiry. On

Dialectical argumentation to solve confl
โœ FLORIANA GRASSO; ALISON CAWSEY; RAY JONES ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 404 KB

Con#ict situations do not only arise from misunderstandings, erroneous perceptions, partial knowledge, false beliefs, etc., but also from di!erences in &&opinions'' and in the di!erent agents' value systems. It is not always possible, and maybe not even desirable, to &&solve'' this kind of con#ict,