Antecedents and consequences of relational components of the new psychological contract
β Scribed by Marcie A. Cavanaugh; Raymond A. Noe
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 161 KB
- Volume
- 20
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0894-3796
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The literature regarding the new psychological contract suggests that the traditional paternalistic employerΒ±employee relationship in U.S. companies has eroded. We investigated the relationship between relational components of the new psychological contract (personal responsibility for career development, commitment to type of work, and expectations of job insecurity), work experiences (involuntary job loss, organizational change, voluntary job change, and violation of obligations), and work outcomes (job satisfaction, participation in development activities, and intention to remain with the employer). We hypothesized that managerial and professional employees' level of agreement with relational components of the new psychological contract would mediate the relationship between their work experiences and work outcomes. In partial support of the model, we found that level of agreement with relational components of the new psychological contract mediated the relationship between work experiences and intention to remain with the employer and job satisfaction. Contrary to the model, no relationship was found among work experiences, level of agreement with relational components of the new psychological contract, and participation in development activities.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
David Guest's (1998) complaint about the `problem' of the psychological contract gives me a welcome opportunity to comment on the distinctiveΓand perhaps misunderstoodΓaspects of the concept of the `psychological contract'. I believe that Guest's argument is based upon a series of misconceptions reg
This study examines factors aecting employees' perceptions that their psychological contract has been breached by their organization, and factors aecting whether this perception will cause employees to experience feelings of contract violation. Data were obtained from 147 managers just prior to thei