𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Analysis of multilocus models of association

✍ Scribed by B. Devlin; Kathryn Roeder; Larry Wasserman


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
163 KB
Volume
25
Category
Article
ISSN
0741-0395

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

It is increasingly recognized that multiple genetic variants, within the same or different genes, combine to affect liability for many common diseases. Indeed, the variants may interact among themselves and with environmental factors. Thus realistic genetic/statistical models can include an extremely large number of parameters, and it is by no means obvious how to find the variants contributing to liability. For models of multiple candidate genes and their interactions, we prove that statistical inference can be based on controlling the false discovery rate (FDR), which is defined as the expected number of false rejections divided by the number of rejections. Controlling the FDR automatically controls the overall error rate in the special case that all the null hypotheses are true. So do more standard methods such as Bonferroni correction. However, when some null hypotheses are false, the goals of Bonferroni and FDR differ, and FDR will have better power. Model selection procedures, such as forward stepwise regression, are often used to choose important predictors for complex models. By analysis of simulations of such models, we compare a computationally efficient form of forward stepwise regression against the FDR methods. We show that model selection includes numerous genetic variants having no impact on the trait, whereas FDR maintains a false‐positive rate very close to the nominal rate. With good control over false positives and better power than Bonferroni, the FDR‐based methods we introduce present a viable means of evaluating complex, multivariate genetic models. Naturally, as for any method seeking to explore complex genetic models, the power of the methods is limited by sample size and model complexity. Genet Epidemiol 25:36–47, 2003. Β© 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Bayesian analysis of multilocus associat
✍ Riika Kilpikari; Mikko J. SillanpÀÀ πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2003 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 211 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract A Bayesian model‐based method for multilocus association analysis of quantitative and qualitative (binary) traits is presented. The method selects a trait‐associated subset of markers among candidates, and is equally applicable for analyzing wide chromosomal segments (genome scans) and

Deriving components of genetic variance
✍ Hemant K. Tiwari; Robert C. Elston πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 50 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

Several authors have considered two-locus models as a basis for the inheritance of complex diseases. The purpose of this paper is to give a simple general formulation to derive the additive, dominant, and epistatic effects, and hence the corresponding variance components, for any multilocus model. T

Use of unphased multilocus genotype data
✍ David Clayton; Juliet Chapman; Jason Cooper πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2004 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 165 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract It is usually assumed that detection of a disease susceptability gene via marker polymorphisms in linkage disequilibrium with it is facilitated by consideration of marker haplotypes. However, capture of the marker haplotype information requires resolution of gametic phase, and this must

Log-linear model analysis of allelic ass
✍ C. E. Aston; S. R. Wilson; D. C. Rao πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1986 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 376 KB

An approach is outlined for the analysis of nonrandom allelic associations in multilocus systems in a diploid population. The concept of composite link functions in generalised linear model analysis is used to handle the problem of incomplete identification of constituent gametes often encountered i