๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

An organizational behavior model of students' evaluation of instruction

โœ Scribed by Yoram Neumann; Edith Finaly-Neumann


Publisher
Springer
Year
1989
Tongue
English
Weight
650 KB
Volume
18
Category
Article
ISSN
0018-1560

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


The present study develops and tests an organizational behavior model of students' evaluation of instruction outlining the causal relationships among levels of instruction, feedback, goal-setting, student's accomplishment, and studem's instructional evaluation.

The major findings of this study arc: (a) The organizational behavior model is one of the strongest predictors of student's overall instructional evaluation. (lo) Student's accomplishment, while comrolling for the effects of other independent variables, does not contribute to predicting overall evaluation of instruction. (c) Feedback and goal-setting are the most powerful predictors of overall evaluation of instruction. (d) The means, standard deviations and reliability coefficients of the various variables and the interrelationships among the various variables are similar at two points of time (midsemester and end-semester). The implications of these findings are discussed and elaborated.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The effects of organizational factors on
โœ Tamar Avi-Itzhak; Lya Kremer ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1983 ๐Ÿ› Springer ๐ŸŒ English โš– 334 KB

The objective of this study is to explore a) which dimension of student ratings and which aspects of perceived instruction are affected by the two organizational factors, enrollment size and academic affiliation, and b) the nature of their effect. Two thousand five hundred students participating in

Exhibits facilitate histology laboratory
โœ McMillan, Paul J. ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2001 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 642 KB

## Abstract Some professional schools have replaced microscopes for histology laboratory instruction with printed and electronic media. It is recognized that these media cannot replace experience with the microscope and that there is a cognitive dissonance of completely replacing microscope study.