The standard approach to combining n expert forecasts involves taking a weighted average. Granger and Ramanathan proposed introducing an intercept term and unnormalized weights. This paper deduces their proposal from Bayesian principles. We find that their formula is equivalent to taking a weighted
An evaluation of bayesian forecasting
β Scribed by Robert Fildes
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1983
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 941 KB
- Volume
- 2
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0277-6693
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Bayesian forecasting' is a time series method of forecasting which (in the United Kingdom) has become synonymous with the state space formulation of Harrison and Stevens (1976). The approach is distinct from other time series methods in that it envisages changes in model structure. A disjoint class of models is chosen to encompass the changes. Each data point is retrospectively evaluated (using Bayes theorem) to judge which of the models held. Forecasts are then derived conditional on an assumed model holding true. The final forecasts are weighted sums of these conditional forecasts.
Few empirical evaluations have been carried out. This paper reports a large scale comparison of time series forecasting methods including the Bayesian. The approach is two fold: a simulation study to examine parameter sensitivity and an empirical study which contrasts Bayesian with other time series methods. KEY WORDS Bayesian forecasting Comparative methods-time series Exponential smoothing Stationarity Data-simulation Estimation-Kalman filter THE BAYESIAN FORECASTING MODEL Bayesian methods have frequently been used in forecasting applications, typically as a means of estimating the parameters of a model (e.g. Zellner, 1971). This approach adds little new to conventional methods of model estimation. However, Zellner also described an important new way of looking at the problem of deciding which of a number of distinct models best encapsulated both the researcher's prior views on each model's validity and the experimental evidence that had been collected. Both uses of Bayesian thinking were effectively incorporated in a method that has become known as Bayesian forecasting. It was proposed by Harrison and Stevens in their paper and its mathematical basis was made more explicit in a subsequent paper (Harrison and Stevens, 1971, 1976). While it was primarily a univariate time series method of forecasting, it was easily extended as the 1976 paper showed. Relatively few applications have been published, despite
The Gunning Fog Index for this paper is 14.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Economists, like other forecasters, share knowledge, data and theories in common. Consequently, their forecast errors are likely to be highly dependent. This paper reports on an empirical study of 16 macroeconomic forecasters. Composite forecasts are computed using a sequential weighting scheme that
## Abstract One popular method for testing the validity of a model's forecasts is to use the probability integral transforms (__pits__) of the forecasts and to test for departures from the dual hypotheses of independence and uniformity, with departures from uniformity tested using the KolmogorovβSm
## Abstract A nonlinear geometric combination of statistical models is proposed as an alternative approach to the usual linear combination or mixture. Contrary to the linear, the geometric model is closed under the regular exponential family of distributions, as we show. As a consequence, the distr
This paper examines the quarterly forecasts by the U.K. National Institute of Economic and Social Research of the rate of inflation and the change in real gross domestic product and its components for horizons of one to four quarters ahead in the U.K. The forecasts are tested to see if they satisfy
We provide a general Bayesian model for combining forecasts from experts (or forecasting models) who might be biased and correlated with each other. The combination procedure involves debiasing and then combining unbiased forecasts. We also provide a sequential method for learning about the forecast