Moshman and Marcus estimated an increase in right-turn accidents of 21% following the adoption of right turn on red. However, their study contained property damage only accidents, as well as injury accidents, and the change in injury accidents was not reported. An irisigniticant decrease (-0.7%) in
Adoption of right turn on red: Effects on crashes at signalized intersections
β Scribed by Paul Zador; Jack Moshman; Leo Marcus
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1982
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 849 KB
- Volume
- 14
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0001-4575
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
By the end of the 1970's, all states in the U.S. had modified their laws to permit drivers to turn right on steady red at signafized intersections. Police-reported crash data from six states ',,,here permissive right turn on red (RTOR) lav, s were adopted during 1974-1977, as well as data from three states where the law in effect was unchanged throughout the period, were used to determine the effect of adopting such laws on the frequency of crashes in,,olving right turning maneuvers at signalized intersections. The increase in the overall frequency of such crashes in states that adopted permissive right turn on red laws exceeded by more than 20% the comparable change in states that retained the same laws. Larger increases were found in urban areas (25%), and for pedestrian crashes (57%) especially in urban areas (79%). An increase of over 30% was found for child pedestrians, 100% for adults, and 110% for elderly pedestrians after adoption of RTOR.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Alternative analyses of data previously published by Zador er al. confirm that adoption of right-turn-on-red laws increased by about 18% the frequency of all right-turning crashes at all signalized intersections in the jurisdictions that adopted such laws. From a review of the available literature