Accumulating resampling (modulation) in comprehensive two-dimensional capillary GC (GC×GC)

✍ Scribed by Leonid M. Blumberg

• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
• Year: 2008
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 608 KB
• Volume: 31
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 1615-9306
• DOI: 10.1002/jssc.200800424

✦ Synopsis

Abstract

During each sampling period, an accumulating resampler (modulator) in comprehensive 2‐D chromatography accumulates all eluite from the first‐dimension column and reinjects the whole or a portion of the accumulated material into the second‐dimension column. The detrimental effect of the resampling on peak capacity of a 2‐D separation comes from the broadening of the peaks along the first‐dimension due to the resampling itself and due to the subsequent peak reconstruction. Sampling density (ρ~S~) of resampling is the number of sampling periods per standard deviation of a peak at the outlet of the first‐dimension column. It is shown that a simple formula describes the peak broadening as a function of ρ~S~ at any (even practically too low or too high) ρ~S~, for the peaks of any (not necessarily Gaussian) shape, for a wide class of peak reconstruction techniques, and for any 2‐D separation (GC×GC, LC×LC, etc.). In capillary GC×GC, optimal ρ~S~ (ρ~S,Opt~) depends on the type of the peak reconstruction and on the degree of the gas decompression along the second‐dimension column. When reconstructing using linear interpolation, ρ~S,Opt~ = 0.7 at large and ρ~S,Opt~ = 0.5 at small gas decompression. The choice of exact optimal conditions is not critical. Thus, two‐fold departure of actual ρ~S~ from ρ~S,Opt~ in either direction (under‐ or oversampling) causes only 10% drop in the net peak capacity of GC×GC. The quantitative effect of a much greater undersampling is also evaluated.