A radioimmunoassay procedure was developed for the antihistamine terfenadine (alpha[4-(1,2-dimethylethyl)phenyl]-4-(hydroxydiphenylmethyl)-1-piperidinebutanol). The keto analog of terfenadine was converted to its O-carboxymethyloxime derivative, which was conjugated to bovine thyroglobulin by a mixe
A radioimmunoassay for the determination of tipredane in human plasma
โ Scribed by M.A.J. Bayliss; J.R. Preston; D. Wilkinson; D.J. Wilkinson; W.J.S. Lockley
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1996
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 648 KB
- Volume
- 15
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0731-7085
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
A sensitive method for the determination of tipredane in human plasma has been developed. Prior to radioimmunoassay, proteins are removed from plasma by precipitation with acetonitrile. A [125I]iodohistamide derivative of tipredane is used as a heterogeneous radioligand. The primary antiserum is raised in sheep against a tipredane (O-carboxymethyl) oxime-bovine serum albumin conjugate. Donkey anti-sheep IgG antiserum is used as the secondary antiserum in a double antibody separation procedure. The limit of quantification of the method is 1 ng ml-1 for 500 microliters of plasma. There is no significant interference from either established or putative metabolites of tipredane, endogenous steroids or a wide range of other drugs. The assay was used to determine the concentrations of tipredane in plasma samples collected in pilot clinical studies.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
A precise and sensitive radioimmunoassay to determine human plasma lamotrigine (430C78), Lamictal) is described. The method is a direct double antibody procedure employing a rabbit polyclonal first antibody raised to a BSA conjugate of lamotrigine, and an iodinated tyrosine methyl ester of lamotrigi
A sensitive method is described for the radioimmunoassay of danazol in monkey and human plasma. Antiserum was developed in rabbits, and a second antibody was used to separate bound from free danazol. The radioimmunoassay was specific for danazol, and the limit of detection ranged from 1.4 to 2.8 ng/
as well as differences in the two standard deviations, and since the means themselves are tested for equality in the ANOVA, the 75/75 Rule also might be said to place the test product in double jeopardy. The stress placed previously (1) on a "well-defined ref- erence standard which has reproducibl