## Abstract Debates about the utility of conscientiousness as a predictor of job performance have focused primarily on mean effect size estimates, despite theoretical and empirical reasons to expect variability across situations. The present study meta‐analytically demonstrates that occupation‐leve
A meta-analytic investigation of contrast effects in decision making
✍ Scribed by Mary Conway Dato-on; Robert Dahlstrom
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2003
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 142 KB
- Volume
- 20
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0742-6046
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Several theoretical perspectives and numerous experiments illustrate the influence of context on social judgment. Debate ensues, however, when researchers attempt to describe mechanisms that lead persons to contrast current decisions with prior judgments. The purpose of this study is to summarize and qualify prior analyses of the influences of context on judgment. Procedural conditions, stimuli type, and priming conditions are implicated as factors that moderate the main effect of extremity on contrastive judgments. Meta‐analytical methods assess the main effect and moderators of contrastive judgments. Discussion of the results focuses on the implications of the study for theory of contrastive judgments and strategy. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract The research presented in this paper aims to support the macroergonomics adoption improvement process by developing a broader understanding of relationships between key macroergonomics factors and management styles. The methodology involves knowledge acquisition, identifying, and catego
## Abstract Schein's theory (1992) implies that in an organization with a “learning culture” employees must participate in decision‐making activities. This study explores the proposition that there is a relationship between employee participation in decision making and organizational learning cultu