A meta-analytic investigation into the moderating effects of situational strength on the conscientiousness–performance relationship
✍ Scribed by Rustin D. Meyer; Reeshad S. Dalal; Silvia Bonaccio
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 183 KB
- Volume
- 30
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0894-3796
- DOI
- 10.1002/job.602
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Debates about the utility of conscientiousness as a predictor of job performance have focused primarily on mean effect size estimates, despite theoretical and empirical reasons to expect variability across situations. The present study meta‐analytically demonstrates that occupation‐level situational strength is one important source of this variability. Consistent with theory, predicted uncorrected conscientiousness–performance correlations ranged from r = .09 to .23 (overall performance) and r = .06 to .18 (task performance), with stronger correlations observed in weak occupations. These results highlight the need for continued inquiry into the nature of situational strength, its impact on other predictor–outcome relationships, and the implications of these issues vis‐à‐vis theory and practice. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Human resource management bundles consisting of multiple complementary practices are typically considered superior to individual best practices in influencing firm performance. This study investigates the relationship between three such bundles (empowerment, motivation, and skill‐enhanc
Land surface parameterizations used in atmospheric general circulation models (AGCMs) are one dimensional representations of the transfer of energy and water vapour at the earth's surface over grid squares that are typically of the order of 10 4 km 2 . It is known, however, that climate variables an
## Abstract ## Objective To assess the effects of paroxetine and mirtazapine on psychometric performance related to car driving, including an on‐the‐road test of BRT. ## Method In a 4‐way, double blind randomised crossover study, 12 healthy volunteers received paroxetine 20 mg mane, mirtazapine